I play this game every year on this day.
Sore loser? There hasn't been a SINGLE valid counter to my arguments.
1) Until you learn how to counter MY arguments, or amazy's or Macron's, with something better than what you've already spouted out thus far, we needn't bother responding to you at all. Also, 'arguments', be they logical or illogical, can take any direction, and are subject to countless factors depending on who is doing the arguing and where.
Just because they don't go as 'you wanted it to' or 'as expected', doesn't mean we aren't already responding to them
2) Likewise, Little Mister. You cannot prove much more than what text/links do even if you'd tried. We're not convinced he exists by cheap messages alone and by what some measly group like the 'BROTRR' thinks of it. If you want us to stop naysaying about his non-existence, then stop failing to prove he DOES exist, sore-loser.
3) Perhaps you're focusing too much on the 'critical thinking' aspect and not enough on the diversity of others when it comes to arguing. Nice attempt at a Hobson's choice, incidentally. But it won't work.
Keyboards don't hurt people. Keyboard Warriors do.
ViewtifulGene posted...Sore loser? There hasn't been a SINGLE valid counter to my arguments.
1. I did address your arguments. Read my other posts where I explained why Amayzy's ideas were invalid. He has not proven that Supez doesn't exist, only that few people ahve seen him in person. He has not proven that we are trolls, only that we appear to be trolls. He has not proven that we are harassing him, only that he is letting himself be harassed. As far as I know, besides jumping to conclusions based on appearances, you have made nothing but ad hominem fallacies in response to my arguments.
An ad hominem is not a logical response to an argument. Calling some one a jerk, a druggie, a sap, etc, does not prove the argument false. To prove the argument false, you must respond to that poster's IDEAS rather than attacking the person directly.
2. Yes I can. I used my text boxes to invite you all to see King Supez tha 6'4" with your own eyes, IN PERSON. I even offered directions for anybody who asked. It's not my fault if you ignore such an opportunity. But if you ignore that opportunity, you cannot possibly blame me for not presenting evidence that cannot be presented online.
3. Diversity has no value unless the new ideas being brought to the table are valid. A "different' opinion has no value if it is not well-reasoned. And the reasoning of yourself and Amayzy has been invalid. Amayzy criticizes a game he knows nothing about and promotes religious intolerance. You call people names and jump to conclusions based on appearances.
If you want me to respect your reasoning, then present me a RESPECTABLE argumemt. If you think my reasoning is not respectable, then present me a VALID explanation of why my argument is not respectable. No, saying I look like a troll is not valid explanation, for looks are often deceiving. (Unless every single drag queen has real breasts and no male member. ) No, calling me names is not a valid counter, because a person who is a jerk, a sap, or a druggie does not speak to the reasoning of my argument.
BROTRR Macron has learned to repent so anything he said against us is now irrelevant.
"Once again, ViewtifulGene's logic blows minds and crushes dreams." -TheGamingGolfer
Official Batman of the SSB4 Board