This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

6-0 vs 6-7

#1Ray_AP_37Posted 8/9/2014 7:04:14 PM
Player A and Player B both played for 15 years. Player A is 6-0 in the NBA Finals with 6 Finals MVPs. Player B is 6-7 with 6 FMVPs. All other variables are identical. Which is the better achievement? - Results (161 votes)
6-0
35.4% (57 votes)
57
6-7
64.6% (104 votes)
104
This poll is now closed.
Only registered users, Ray AP topic, blah blah

Here's to hoping the NBA Board doesn't let me down again *lifts champagne glass*
---
The sheep know Jordan is the GOAT. Bow down. CONFORM OR DIE. http://tinyurl.com/n7strxo
"They don't give runner up medals"- bond21
#2Flamingace18Posted 8/9/2014 7:06:01 PM
6-7. But it could very easily be the 6-0 player as well. There are to many variables and stuff that goes into this.
---
Oklahoma City Thunder, Texas Rangers, St Louis Rams, and Oklahoma Sooners fan. http://cdn2.sbnation.com/assets/3914361/Russ-Troll_medium.gif
#3Ray_AP_37(Topic Creator)Posted 8/9/2014 7:06:51 PM
Flamingace18 posted...
There are to many variables and stuff that goes into this.

<_< That's why I said all other variables are identical.
---
The sheep know Jordan is the GOAT. Bow down. CONFORM OR DIE. http://tinyurl.com/n7strxo
"They don't give runner up medals"- bond21
#4Tony_Biggie_PunPosted 8/9/2014 7:07:38 PM
Kareem>MJ
#5Ray_AP_37(Topic Creator)Posted 8/9/2014 7:08:20 PM
Tony_Biggie_Pun posted...
Kareem>MJ

6 is literally > 2
---
The sheep know Jordan is the GOAT. Bow down. CONFORM OR DIE. http://tinyurl.com/n7strxo
"They don't give runner up medals"- bond21
#6SSJ92gokuPosted 8/9/2014 7:08:54 PM
6-7



As long as you win as many rings the more finals appearances the better.. anyone arguing against it is dumb. The thing is, generally when "lol 6-0" is brought up, player B has less rings
---
If shooting 80% is so ez, do it- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6sdfy3dnQE
lol no fatigue- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f840seiVhjU
#7Ray_AP_37(Topic Creator)Posted 8/9/2014 7:10:35 PM
SSJ92goku posted...
As long as you win as many rings the more finals appearances the better.. anyone arguing against it is dumb. The thing is, generally when "lol 6-0" is brought up, player B has less rings

This made me think. How far does this logic go? Is 6-0 > 5-15? Maybe in a vacuum yes, but I think the 5-15 could be argued as the better player.
---
The sheep know Jordan is the GOAT. Bow down. CONFORM OR DIE. http://tinyurl.com/n7strxo
"They don't give runner up medals"- bond21
#8AestheticaLZPosted 8/9/2014 7:15:06 PM
Ray_AP_37 posted...
SSJ92goku posted...
As long as you win as many rings the more finals appearances the better.. anyone arguing against it is dumb. The thing is, generally when "lol 6-0" is brought up, player B has less rings

This made me think. How far does this logic go? Is 6-0 > 5-15? Maybe in a vacuum yes, but I think the 5-15 could be argued as the better player.


Um... No 6 is still > 5. You cannot argue with logic as they won less.
---
Hanging from Shower Rods, Damn I love god
#bangbang
#9Ray_AP_37(Topic Creator)Posted 8/9/2014 7:16:14 PM
That's why I said:

Ray_AP_37 posted...
Maybe in a vacuum yes, but I think the 5-15 could be argued as the better player.

The "maybe" wasn't necessary in hindsight.
---
The sheep know Jordan is the GOAT. Bow down. CONFORM OR DIE. http://tinyurl.com/n7strxo
"They don't give runner up medals"- bond21
#10dawiseone4Posted 8/9/2014 7:16:20 PM
idc what anyone says.

Undefeated in the finals and never having to go to a game 7 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
---
http://i.imgur.com/LyNER6H.gif | http://i.imgur.com/XOdjA8J.gif | http://i.imgur.com/LI9v4m1.gif