Paranormal / Conspiracy

Types of Bleach

There are several types of bleach. Chlorine bleach usually contains sodium hypochlorite. Oxygen bleach contains hydrogen peroxide or a peroxide-releasing compound such as sodium perborate or sodium percarbonate. Bleaching powder is calcium hypochlorite. Other bleaching agents include sodium persulfate, sodium perphosphate, sodium persilicate, their ammonium, potassium and lithium analogs, calcium peroxide, zinc peroxide, sodium peroxide, carbamide peroxide, chlorine dioxide, bromate, and organic peroxides (e.g., benzoyl peroxide).



yes, chlorine dioxide is one type of bleach. and yes, i have been drinking it for 5 years and i've only gotten sick twice from flu during that time (in which the MMS has cured me within 2-3 days while my friends who i caught it from were sick for 3-4 weeks).

regarding the case of the woman who died after drinking MMS (http://www.dailypost.vu/content/prosecutor-decides-no-charges-can-be-laid-case-death-linked-mms) if you read the article, it says there was an autopsy yet it doesn't state the results; so the only tie is that she supposively drank some MMS then died 15 minutes later. This is not conclusive. Plus, they aren't even holding the MMS suppliers accountable (I would; maybe they are selling a bad product).

Millions of people have been using MMS for years, and this is the only case in which there is any link, which is still inconclusive. She was likely already quite sick if she needed the MMS in the first place.

I know you guys like playing the devil's advocate, and I really don't care. This is a paranormal/conspiracy board so I shouldn't expect much. I am very suspect myself about many government agents like the new world order, bush planned 9/11, etc. etc.

I've also read a lot of stories about real doctors who recommend MMS to their patients. This is not legal for them to do, so many do not, but they do it because they know it works better then any prescription they can prescribe. Remember, medicine is not made to cure illness, it's only made to treat the symptoms until your body can naturally fight it off.

If you want to know what truely kills people, it is chemotherapy. It destroys the body's immune system and kills more people then cancer. It is the most obvious dangerous thing a person can do, yet doctors still perform it everyday. The point being, it is hypocritical to to say MMS is a dangerous chemical so you should not drink it (it's not dangerous in low doses!)

If you want to be healed, healthy, cured, etc. then I will help you. If not, then leave me alone. It's like what I tell Christians about understanding life and the universe; if you want to know the truth about the history of existance then I will teach you. If you want to live with your head up your ass then go right ahead and leave me out of it.

Lifelong bleach drinker unlocks secret of the "history of existance"

more at 11
---
The Poster temporarily not known as Sillyknees.

She was likely already quite sick if she needed the MMS in the first place.

So there's no way you'd accept that MMS actually killed someone, then?

Remember, medicine is not made to cure illness, it's only made to treat the symptoms until your body can naturally fight it off.

For viral diseases, yeah. Most others (antibiotics, antiparasitics, etc.) actually attack the cause.

If you want to know what truely kills people, it is chemotherapy. It destroys the body's immune system and kills more people then cancer.

You have a source to back this up? Because I'm calling bull****. If chemo killed more people than cancer, people would stop using it, because chemo is used to treat cancer. No one's going to use a drug that's more dangerous than the disease.

It is the most obvious dangerous thing a person can do, yet doctors still perform it everyday.

Because it actually works, unlike your MMS bull. You still have yet to provide a link that shows it does what you claim it does.
---
By Evolution, I mean Evolution. As in "I look different from my parents because of evolution" ~OrangeWizard

futantshadow posted...

If you want to know what truely kills people, it is chemotherapy. It destroys the body's immune system and kills more people then cancer. It is the most obvious dangerous thing a person can do, yet doctors still perform it everyday. The point being, it is hypocritical to to say MMS is a dangerous chemical so you should not drink it (it's not dangerous in low doses!)

Hello, this is the point, and you have missed me.

Chemotherapy still works, and it may actually help the person gets better. There's a risk, but there could also be a reward. With MMS (despite you ignoring all contrary evidence) there is zero evidence that it works, and even some evidence that it could be dangerous in low amounts.

If you want to be healed, healthy, cured, etc. then I will help you. If not, then leave me alone. It's like what I tell Christians about understanding life and the universe; if you want to know the truth about the history of existance then I will teach you. If you want to live with your head up your ass then go right ahead and leave me out of it.

As I pointed out before, you're the one being close minded.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI
---
Splash

[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

BashyMcFetus, this is the link that proves MMS (chlorine dioxide) kills pathogens such as malaria-

http://bioredox.mysite.com/CLOXhtml/CLOXprnt+refs.htm

Your link's broken. Besides, I never disputed that it killed stuff. It's just more dangerous than it worth.

and if MMS actually killed someone, I definately would like to know. but the article provided showed no actual evidence (like autopsy report) of the MMS being the actual cause.

Thing is, though, you said she had to be pretty sick to be taking MMS in the first place. Anyone that dies from MMS, you're gonna rationalize away as dying from whatever ailment caused them to drink MMS.

the person could have drank a glass of water then died and OMG water is bad.

Right, yeah, it's just a coincidence she died 15 minutes after drinking industrial bleach.

if you want to know the truth then do your own research,

I did my own research. It shows that you're wrong.
---
By Evolution, I mean Evolution. As in "I look different from my parents because of evolution" ~OrangeWizard

http://qkme.me/3p97fu

Drinking bleach is bad, mmmmkay?

But homosexuality is both natural and normal. So I guess there's no problem here.

nor·mal
[nawr-muhl]

adjective
1. conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; not abnormal; regular; natural.

Homosexuality by this definition is not normal. Homosexuality is less common than heterosexuality. Therefore it is not "normal". While it can be hard to identify a highly accurate number, it is generally accepted that homosexuality is less common than heterosexuality. Even Kinsey's questionable numbers put it at 37% at best.

Estimates of the occurrence of same-sex behavior range from 2 to 13 percent of the population.[8][9][12][13][15][16][17][18][102] A 1992 study reported that 6.1% of males in Britain had had a homosexual experience, while in France the number was 4.1%.[103] According to a 2003 survey, 12% of Norwegians have had homosexual sex.[16] In New Zealand, a 2006 study suggested that 20% of the population anonymously reported some homosexual feelings, few of them identifying as homosexual. Percentage of persons identifying homosexual was 2–3%.[18] According to a 2008 poll, while only 6% of Britons define their sexual orientation as homosexual or bisexual, more than twice that number (13%) of Britons have had some form of sexual contact with someone of the same sex.[17]

In the United States, according to exit polling on 2008 Election Day for the 2008 Presidential elections, 4% of electorate self-identified as gay, lesbian, or bisexual, the same percentage as in 2004."[104] According to the 2000 United States Census there were about 601,209 same-sex unmarried partner households.[105] In the UK, the UK Office for National Statistics survey have come up with the figure that 1.5% are gay or bisexual, and suggest that this is in line with other surveys showing between 0.3% and 3%.[106

Does not conform to the definition of normal in my opinion.
---
Spending time in a gym is worthless, from a functional perspective, unless you're a bodybuilder, model, or personal trainer.--Shyrric

Adjective:
Conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.

Homosexuality fits this definition of the word normal. Homosexuality is normal in the same way being a white person is normal. Most people aren't white, but that doesn't mean there's anything abnormal about it.