How should I see The Hobbit (3-D, HFR, or regular)

  • Topic Archived

You have been randomly selected to participate in the Beta Test of our new message list page. We've rolled out this test in order to get additional feedback and error reports from a wider subset of users. We'll only display this notice once, but permanent links to disable the Beta, provide feedback, and get more information will be located at the bottom of each message list.

To disable this test for now, click here. For more information, please read our announcement about this redesign.

  1. Boards
  2. Movies: At the Theater
  3. How should I see The Hobbit (3-D, HFR, or regular)
2 years ago#11
From what I've been reading, the difference in quality between HFR and 24FPS is massive. Yes, a lot of people have issues with it, at least initially, since your brain is generally trained to look for 24FPS in movies so everything looks to be going at a quicker pace in 48FPS simply because you're essentially absorbing two-times the information. However, when you "adjust" to it the clarity of the scenes and the smoothness of the action is supposedly pretty incredible. It's so well-defined it can actually make some scenes look worse [for example, the set-pieces/CGI are easier to spot].

I haven't seen it in HFR yet [only IMAX 3D, which I loved], but I'll be going tomorrow [I just purchased my tickets]. I'll post my experience here after I do.
---
"T**s are life, ass is hometown." - Kenichiro Takaki [Senran Kagura producer]
2 years ago#12
The difference is massive. But, for my money, not for the better. It works for some parts of the movie, but not most. Just my opinion, of course.
---
"As a man in a relationship, you can either be right, or you can be happy."
2 years ago#13
redalert62386 posted...
The difference is massive. But, for my money, not for the better. It works for some parts of the movie, but not most. Just my opinion, of course.



Agreed. I lasted 20 minutes before I swapped to a 24fps auditorium. The effect is amazing. But it doesn't do this movie any favors. Better suited with a different directing style and/or a different genre like documentaries and sports films.

In this epic drama ... 48fps makes all of Peter Jackson's thoughtful and subtle camera moves appear to be the work of an excited student film-maker with his first video camera. And the actors with the most pronounced mannerisms and gestures appear cartoony and sped up.

2 years ago#14
I didn't understand why PJ was pushing this format until I actually saw it. Now I don't know if I can go back to watching a 3D movie in 24fps.
---
Talk is cheap...because supply exceeds demand.
2 years ago#15
Well I just got back from my 3D HFR showing [second time seeing it, first time in IMAX 3D] and I can honestly say I preferred the 48FPS. In some areas it definitely made the CGI look more noticeable [I don't know if it's because of the super-smooth motion], but for most of it, things just looked...better. The 3D absolutely "popped" more, and while it did look like the movie was being played at 2x speed [at least initially], my eyes got used to it.

I really do hope The Hobbit Part 2/3 are shot in 48FPS. I think it's one of those things that takes a while to become mainstream, but I really hope it does. To me, especially after a few tweaks here and there, it's where movies should advance to.
---
"T**s are life, ass is hometown." - Kenichiro Takaki [Senran Kagura producer]
  1. Boards
  2. Movies: At the Theater
  3. How should I see The Hobbit (3-D, HFR, or regular)

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

Message List Beta Test is now on. To disable the Beta, just click here, or you can read more about it, report an error, or provide general feedback.
  • Topic Archived