This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

why is logic and reason so hard to accept

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. why is logic and reason so hard to accept
4 years ago#1
how can things reaching outside the realm of logic be considered truth?
4 years ago#2
Far as I can tell, people feel there MUST be something spiritual out there. I don't know, I guess it's usually hard for people to be objective.
---
Of course the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you--if you don't play, you can't win. -- Robert Heinlein
'Would have', not 'would of'.
4 years ago#3
People think logic is subjective.
---
Evolution is a scientific fact with tons of conclusive evidence.
Here is a shortened link to a Google Doc that compiles said evidence: http://goo.gl/hWwzO
4 years ago#4
are*

logic is a machine. It accepts premises and cranks out conclusions. But where do the premises come from? On something physical and scientific, the premises are easy enough to come by. I dropped the ball, it fell to the ground. I dropped the peanut, it fell to the ground. I jumped and fell to the ground. Gravity. But when we get into the issue of religion, premises are much harder to come by: In fact, there is little objective basis to make a claim for or against the existence of a deity. Without a hard ground on which to found premises, the same, objective logic will crank out different conclusions.
---
"An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." -H.L. Mencken
4 years ago#5
Sure, but those conclusions should be valid.
---
Evolution is a scientific fact with tons of conclusive evidence.
Here is a shortened link to a Google Doc that compiles said evidence: http://goo.gl/hWwzO
4 years ago#6
You can't say something along the lines of "well, this is valid TO ME, that's how MY logic works."

Uh, no. A fallacy is a fallacy.
---
Evolution is a scientific fact with tons of conclusive evidence.
Here is a shortened link to a Google Doc that compiles said evidence: http://goo.gl/hWwzO
4 years ago#7
I dont hide behind pseudosubjectivism, lesserfaith.

Sure, but those conclusions should be valid.

Are my conclusions invalid?
---
"An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." -H.L. Mencken
4 years ago#8
No, they are valid. I never said they weren't.

You're arguing that difference conclusions could be drawn, and I agree, they can. But they all must be valid.

Most people who don't "accept" logic think that the rules of informal logic vary from person to person. They don't.
---
Evolution is a scientific fact with tons of conclusive evidence.
Here is a shortened link to a Google Doc that compiles said evidence: http://goo.gl/hWwzO
4 years ago#9
I agree.

*high five*
---
"An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." -H.L. Mencken
4 years ago#10
^_^
---
Evolution is a scientific fact with tons of conclusive evidence.
Here is a shortened link to a Google Doc that compiles said evidence: http://goo.gl/hWwzO
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. why is logic and reason so hard to accept

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived