This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

WLC Wins Another Debate

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. WLC Wins Another Debate
3 years ago#11
WLC has said that evidence isn't important to him. He doesn't debate, he orates.
---
God is man helping man: this is the way to everlasting glory. -Pliny the Elder
3 years ago#12
serpentslayer posted...
WLC has said that evidence isn't important to him. He doesn't debate, he orates.


Pretty much. Not to mention Rosenberg was very poor at making his arguments...he was so boring...he stuttered every 5 seconds and went off on random tangents...

As others have mentioned though, it's no different than Romney beating Obama in that first presidential debate though. Debates aren't always about substance.
---
Desktop: Phenom II X4 965 | 4 GB DDR3 | GTX 580 | 1 TB HD | W7 | 650W Antec | 1600x900
Laptop: A6 3400m | 4 GB DDR3 | HD 6520g | 500 GB HD | W7 | 1366x768
3 years ago#13
WLC's arguments are pretty terrible, but he argues them well. Much better than the atheists he goes up against.
3 years ago#14
WLC is awesome, good for him!
---
http://youtu.be/gmnSnNC8UJk
3 years ago#15
Has WLC ever addressed the rebuttals that infidels.org has made to his arguments?

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/james_still/kalam.html
---
RIP Butters_1188 2005-2009
Prove me wrong
3 years ago#16
Richard Dawkins also has a decent site: http://old.richarddawkins.net/articles/612104-dealing-with-william-lane-craig
---
Desktop: Phenom II X4 965 | 4 GB DDR3 | GTX 580 | 1 TB HD | W7 | 650W Antec | 1600x900
Laptop: A6 3400m | 4 GB DDR3 | HD 6520g | 500 GB HD | W7 | 1366x768
3 years ago#17
TheoreticalBS, anyone?
---
The above is both true and false.
3 years ago#18
I would love to see Dawkins and Craig to head-to-head someday. I gotta admit, as much as Hitchens grates on me, at least he was brave enough to try.
---
http://youtu.be/gmnSnNC8UJk
3 years ago#19
WLC has missed the entire point of Christianity. If his Kalam Argument actually does prove that God exists, then what role is there for faith? Craig's faith is not in God Himself, his faith is in the ability of his own arguments to prove that God is necessary. In other words, he is putting his trust in his own intellect.

To be honest, I would love nothing more than for Dawkins or someone else to prove him completely wrong. It would be a much greater service to his soul than all this intellectual masturbation he's been doing for the last 5 years.
---
Every day the rest of your life is changed forever.
3 years ago#20
C_Mat posted...
I would love to see Dawkins and Craig to head-to-head someday. I gotta admit, as much as Hitchens grates on me, at least he was brave enough to try.


Not gonna happen.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/20/richard-dawkins-william-lane-craig
---
Desktop: Phenom II X4 965 | 4 GB DDR3 | GTX 580 | 1 TB HD | W7 | 650W Antec | 1600x900
Laptop: A6 3400m | 4 GB DDR3 | HD 6520g | 500 GB HD | W7 | 1366x768
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. WLC Wins Another Debate

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived