This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Is "tolerance" of the religious and the secularists good or is it disrespectful?

#21Wandering__HeroPosted 2/19/2013 5:32:16 AM
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance
---
Click the sites these contain to donate to charity for free http://www.thenonprofits.com/
#22UnfairRepresent(Topic Creator)Posted 2/19/2013 6:34:10 AM
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things
---
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
http://i.imgur.com/45yVrRr.jpg
#23FingerpuppetPosted 2/23/2013 9:50:29 PM
UnfairRepresent posted...
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things


Good job. You are an angstheist. But that's okay. I guess that it depends. You know, on how you define it. Angstheism, I mean. Yeah.
---
I recently came back to this site. I don't have an interesting sig, so please say something interesting that I can put here.
#24UnfairRepresent(Topic Creator)Posted 2/25/2013 5:22:15 PM
Fingerpuppet posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things


Good job. You are an angstheist. But that's okay. I guess that it depends. You know, on how you define it. Angstheism, I mean. Yeah.


It's kinda sad that you think calling me an angstheist twice is a valid point.
---
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
http://i.imgur.com/45yVrRr.jpg
#25FingerpuppetPosted 2/27/2013 11:40:55 PM
UnfairRepresent posted...
Fingerpuppet posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things


Good job. You are an angstheist. But that's okay. I guess that it depends. You know, on how you define it. Angstheism, I mean. Yeah.


It's kinda sad that you think calling me an angstheist twice is a valid point.


I didn't call you an angstheist twice; I only called you it once. I put the subject and verb in bold that defines a quality of the subject (the verb "to be", which is is/are.) By my count, it's only in there once...so...
---
I recently came back to this site. I don't have an interesting sig, so please say something interesting that I can put here.