This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Is "tolerance" of the religious and the secularists good or is it disrespectful?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. Is "tolerance" of the religious and the secularists good or is it disrespectful?
3 years ago#21
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance
Click the sites these contain to donate to charity for free http://www.thenonprofits.com/
3 years ago#22
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
http://i.imgur.com/45yVrRr.jpg
3 years ago#23
UnfairRepresent posted...
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things


Good job. You are an angstheist. But that's okay. I guess that it depends. You know, on how you define it. Angstheism, I mean. Yeah.
I recently came back to this site. I don't have an interesting sig, so please say something interesting that I can put here.
3 years ago#24
Fingerpuppet posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things


Good job. You are an angstheist. But that's okay. I guess that it depends. You know, on how you define it. Angstheism, I mean. Yeah.


It's kinda sad that you think calling me an angstheist twice is a valid point.
^ Hey now that's completely unfair.
http://i.imgur.com/45yVrRr.jpg
3 years ago#25
UnfairRepresent posted...
Fingerpuppet posted...
UnfairRepresent posted...
Wandering__Hero posted...
Most of the time tolerance is a massive and obvious improvements over intolerance


I agree. But this really depends on how you define both of those things


Good job. You are an angstheist. But that's okay. I guess that it depends. You know, on how you define it. Angstheism, I mean. Yeah.


It's kinda sad that you think calling me an angstheist twice is a valid point.


I didn't call you an angstheist twice; I only called you it once. I put the subject and verb in bold that defines a quality of the subject (the verb "to be", which is is/are.) By my count, it's only in there once...so...
I recently came back to this site. I don't have an interesting sig, so please say something interesting that I can put here.
  1. Boards
  2. Religion
  3. Is "tolerance" of the religious and the secularists good or is it disrespectful?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived