This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards.

Gilneas was awesome, too bad the rest of Cataclysm was trash

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. World of Warcraft
  3. Gilneas was awesome, too bad the rest of Cataclysm was trash
2 years ago#31
From: ShadowEdgeX | #026
Cata's main failing was how horribly slow they were releasing content.


I rank the whole thing where Blizzard's total focus on end-game balancing made sub-cap content laughably easy because of the changes 4.0+ made. I had a warrior at around level 25'ish going into Cataclysm and she went from "Wow, this is kind of annoying" to "Wow, I can solo whole freaking dungeons!" My shaman was pretty much in the same boat with my rogue and priest nearly there as well. I mean it's really bad when a healer class/build can solo elite mobs in appropriately-leveled 5-mans with little danger if they don't over-pull.

Chalk it up to personal preference, but I prefer balanced content to more content. /shrugs.
---
Stop complaining. I could have done this more painfully. - Dryad from Sacred 2.
  1. Boards
  2. World of Warcraft
  3. Gilneas was awesome, too bad the rest of Cataclysm was trash

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived