That's the only thing that gives me some hope for this. Terry isn't Batman, (i.e. Bruce) but it was entertaining to see a teenage Batman going through all that stuff, even if it wasn't the real Batman. It's pretty much the same for this. It COULD be interesting to see a teen Dante in this, even if it isn't the REAL Dante.
And now I just remembered Dante was a teen in DMC3, so I've just been owned. --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7KDXVEOqj8 http://antir.110mb.com
Not only that, but Batman Beyond was the first Batman passing the torch when he became too old, it wasn't an unnecessary reboot/prequel which can't possibly make sense in the setting as it stands. --- Goodbye Bubbles, dearest of pets. I'll miss you, always. 2nd June 2004 - 22nd August 2009 http://tinylink.in/2L1
Well the problem is, instead of Donte being the apprentice of an old man Dante, he's supposed to be him. Bruce and Terry are different people. Plus, Terry wasn't a crack addict.
Don't get me wrong. I'm giving the game a chance. But a trailer is supposed to give you an idea of what the game is like and is supposed to excite you and it failed to do that for me. --- Salary? Dude, it's College Humor. They get paid in beer and condoms. >_> -Hirumaru XBL GT: El Haroldo
I...just told you why. Terry's not Batman, but it was fun anyway. This new Dante isn't Dante, but it could still be interesting. Both are teens, and it was entertaining to see a teen Batman, (high school, friends, etc.).
I'm jus' sayin'! Leave me alone! --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7KDXVEOqj8 http://antir.110mb.com
Mmm, no. You missed what I'm saying. If you ask people who is Batman, they say Bruce Wayne. Terry, Dick, Azarel or whatever his name is, is not Batman. Only Bruce is THE Batman, hence my statement. --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7KDXVEOqj8 http://antir.110mb.com
That is like saying every new Belmont in a Castlevania game isn't the Belmont but they pretty much are as there are from what we can see only one Belmont per generation or so OR that every new dracula reincarnation that required sacrifice wasn't THE original dracula.
That's like saying a horribly structured sentence that I didn't bother to follow. >_>
Obviously the people gettin' so upset at this are people who are in rage at this change. It's a simple comparison that isn't hard to comprehend. Why did I even bother? --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7KDXVEOqj8 http://antir.110mb.com