3 years ago#61
Oh and How does one enjoy DMC2 more than this demo? As someone who has played through the HD collection recently im very curious cuz DMC2 is probably the worst action game ever. (cant think of any worse.)
I liked DMC2 it's hard to describe but it's still better than DmC
"I will teach you the way true kings fight"
3 years ago#62
Just because you like something more than something else doesn't mean its better
yeah it does... In his opinion. Sorry that you guys aren't on the same mind set.
3 years ago#63
I've played then all and i really enjoyed the demo, liking the look and feel
Also combat was once again fun
3 years ago#64
I disagree with TC. IMO 4 was maybe not the best and the story was a little light but gameplay wise it was excellent.
This game feels like an unpolished DMC to me. Also aesthetically Dino is so unpleasant to watch that alone just ruins the experience for me.
I am yours to command, point out our foes and step out of my way. - Adam, Shining Force
3 years ago#65
_tanjil_ posted...docman864 posted...@_tanjil_
Sure if you wanna play it just to beat it. But DMC is all about being stylish, and DmC is still respecting that by giving you options. Nephilim is normal from what I remember, nothing to be proud of. I mean in DMC you can go through normal mode just spamming Rebellion and you'll win just fine
3 years ago#66
yeah I got you, DMC 4 feels less interesting to me from the plot, enemy design is just not as good as 3, but still u gotta admit the second half u basically repeat the same enemies, bosses and place, it just make the game redundant, if they do put dante on new location with new puzzle, enemy type and bosses, the game will be better for sure, also new weapon its always be plus in DMC series.
I think DMC3 story is more interesting and to the point, also Vergil as bad guys are cool and character such as Lady makes DMC 3 more like stylish action movie even more.
RE5 is not good imo, yes its bigger like they added coop but in survival horror, bigger doesn't mean always good, because survival horror is not just emphasize only in mindless shooting action, setting, atmosphere, pacing, level design are the key n Re4 are undeniably way better on those department.
3 years ago#67
FireMage7777 posted...Just because you like something more than something else doesn't mean its better
Only in his opinion, which is bad
The official Valbanisher, that doesn't believe in kupo
3 years ago#68
troll thread is obvious troll thread :P when it starts with a "i've played all the games" you know it's troll, though i will give the TC a bonus point for knowing to use the obvious DMC3 name drop as a "might even be as good as" example
Unfortunetly you foolishly used the n00b cookie cutter DMC4 example, this is classic "never played much of the games, but i'll pick the last game in the series that wasn't universaly praised by the fanbase of forums to get attention"
Second classic mistake: glossing over details & examples to simply point out the hot topic game will be better just because and hope to get conga line going & manipulate easily ranty fans about dmc4 even though they actually do like it but will tunnel vision on the negatives given an oppertunity you now hope to provide
"This is good, isn't it?" .....*cries* it is good Bigboss......John......it is good~! ; ;
3 years ago#69
So far, I had WAY more than the DMC4 demo (I can't say the full game yet). DmC to me is one of (if not) the best action game demo I've ever played.
You missed out on the Arkhum Asylum demo?
Dayman! aaaAAAaaa Fighter of the Nightman! aaaAAAaaa Champion of the Sun! aaaAAAaaa His a master of karate and friendship for everyone!
3 years ago#70
@Dragoon_Kail What about the topics that go along the lines, "I've played all the DMCs and... this one is crap" Are those guys trolls?
it's probably not fair to say it's worse than DMC2. DmC is supposed to be a DMC like game but doesn't cut it as a DMC but has it's own merits for the action genre.. DMC2 was a DMC game and just failed to be a successor.