I see many DMC elits says that Dmc is easy and DMC was more hardcore?. But what do you mean when you say hardcore. Sure DmC is a little easyer then DMC 1-3. But it was no wear near the diffeculty of Ng, DS ore the old hard games from Nintendo. heck even super mario 3 has some levels that are harder then DMC 3-4. So the question is what dose hardcore mean fore you.
They are just too blinded by fake nostalgia to admit this is good simply because it changed a few things.
Don't mind them, they have no arguements or valid reasons beyond "OMG ITS NOT ORIGINAL DANTE!!"
Honestly they just like to make noise and feel important.
Probably the dumbest post of the day. People on here have stated multiple times in multiple thread why the game is mediocre.
Hard to control does not equal to complex. Complex controls tends to apply to fighters. But you can't argue the AI and difficulty, really.
And really, DMC isn't all that complex either :s
The first two games, not so much. The next two games, pretty much since a lot of fighter elements was applied like one frame move, JC (That was basically Guilty Gear JC but need enemies to step on with good timing), Charging gun while doing something esle or combo (Much like Carl Clover or Zero), Just Block was like Instant Block from GG or BB, Just release (Harder ver. of guard counter from GG and Persona 4) and many more.