DmC: Devil May Cry

I'm asking this because well apparently alot of people think DmC has the best story in the series, and I disagree. I think DMC4 had a better story.

The only problem Dmc4's story had was the characters. Trish and Lady served no purpose in the game, you could of taken them out and the story wouldn't have changed that much at all. Credo had potential but he barely appeared and died too quickly, and Sanctus was pretty much a crappy villain. Atleast his boss fight was fun though.

Kyrie was okay.

Oh and what was the point of Gloria anyway? Why the hell did trish need to disguise herself anyway?
---
JRPG >>>>WPRG

See, the big difference is that DMC4 never claimed the story would break myths.

DmC's creator told us the standards we should hold it to: "The best that theater and film have to offer".

The only problem I had with the story was that they barely explained who the hell Nero was.
---
:D

It was nothing special, but at the same time it wasn't overpretentious, nor flat out terrible like DmC's.

Superficial story.

Poor introduction for some of the characters and a lot of things are only explained in some backstory or different media (like the novel).
---
There is no such thing as a "Quick Time Event done right".
A game that has Quick Time Events is a "video game done wrong".