Do you at least like the idea of a universal dodge button?

#31DarkSymbiotePosted 2/15/2013 9:50:45 AM
Psychochild27 posted...
DarkSymbiote posted...
Psychochild27 posted...
DarkSymbiote posted...
I said they almost got it right.


You also said they did it better.


Yes, I stand by that. I did not like switching styles and weapons in previous games when other games did it in a simpler form. I should not have to use the d-pad to select to evade properly.


Then roll.


The only rolling I approve is how Snake did it in MGS4. Also, rolling would have been fine in a slower paced game.
---
My Resident Evil 6 Review| My XCOM: Enemy Unknown Review
http://bitly.com/Z2CT6n | http://bit.ly/RJGjrn
#32Psychochild27Posted 2/15/2013 9:52:13 AM
DarkSymbiote posted...
Psychochild27 posted...
DarkSymbiote posted...
Psychochild27 posted...
DarkSymbiote posted...
I said they almost got it right.


You also said they did it better.


Yes, I stand by that. I did not like switching styles and weapons in previous games when other games did it in a simpler form. I should not have to use the d-pad to select to evade properly.


Then roll.


The only rolling I approve is how Snake did it in MGS4. Also, rolling would have been fine in a slower paced game.


But the rolling Dante does in DmC is perfectly cool?
#33DarkSymbiotePosted 2/15/2013 9:54:22 AM
^ It's a faster roll so it works. I should have specified. But I forgot.
---
My Resident Evil 6 Review| My XCOM: Enemy Unknown Review
http://bitly.com/Z2CT6n | http://bit.ly/RJGjrn
#34Pesmerga255Posted 2/15/2013 9:56:39 AM
DarkSymbiote posted...
^ It's a faster roll so it works. I should have specified. But I forgot.


The roll animation takes roughly the same amount of time. You just like DmC's roll because it works better for casual players, thanks to the increased invincibility time.
---
I JUST KEEP BURNNING LOVE!
#35DuuuDe14Posted 2/15/2013 10:04:10 AM
Pesmerga255 posted...
DarkSymbiote posted...
^ It's a faster roll so it works. I should have specified. But I forgot.


The roll animation takes roughly the same amount of time. You just like DmC's roll because it works better for casual players, thanks to the increased invincibility time.


Jackpot
---
The Official Sons of Sparda of all GameFaqs boards.
I shall forever be sitting in Dante's chair. Till the day he returns to us.
#36Psychochild27Posted 2/15/2013 10:15:24 AM(edited)
Pesmerga255 posted...
DarkSymbiote posted...
^ It's a faster roll so it works. I should have specified. But I forgot.


The roll animation takes roughly the same amount of time. You just like DmC's roll because it works better for casual players, thanks to the increased invincibility time.



Also, DMC4's roll is actually faster. It takes about .6 seconds on normal speed (I checked it twice because I thought it was on turbo) while DmC's about .8 seconds and they both go approximately the same distance so... he likes it because it's slower and gives him more I-Frames?

/Fraps is great.
#37Phantom_Opera_GPosted 2/15/2013 10:05:53 AM
I'm all for having a dodge button either it be like Bayonetta or a Style like DMC's Trickster. Two dodge buttons with no lock-on however is a big no no.
---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tktRigt_WFg
#38wolf rider(Topic Creator)Posted 2/15/2013 10:54:32 AM
How is Table Hopper a substitute for an 8-way roll?
---
"When was the last time someone said 'Man, I wish this game had MORE QTEs'? Never mother******. That's when!" ~ Samuel L. Jackson on QTEs
True story.
#39Psychochild27Posted 2/15/2013 11:00:46 AM(edited)
wolf rider posted...
How is Table Hopper a substitute for an 8-way roll?


Technically it gives you multiple eight way dashes? It's essentially a Double/Triple Dash.
#40tehXdemiXaznPosted 2/15/2013 11:00:39 AM
IMO, Bayonetta, just like a lot of things handled it best. One button useable at any time in any direction. But the key thing, not sure if anyone remembers is that the button wasn't just for dodging. It was for transforming as well as an attack modifier for some teleport moves. Hell holding it did its own attack. God I love bayonetta.
---
... Nope, it's still the same.