lol 30fps

  • Topic Archived

User Info: FabuIous

FabuIous
4 years ago#61
lol i played through the game at 120 fps @ 120 refresh rate on 1080p 1920x1080 max settings. why are all these idiots who've never experienced anything higher than 60 fps acting all high and mighty?'

anyone whos content with 60 fps is holding back the industry.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/toilethumor
psn : toilethumorr

User Info: SlaveBlade

SlaveBlade
4 years ago#62
ScreamingMidget posted...
All the mad in here!

Let's just agree on the fact that DmC is a POS.


I respectfully disagree.
Interested in a RP about a post apocalyptic future Earth with some Mutant shenanigans? PM me if you wanna join~

User Info: Honey-Boy

Honey-Boy
4 years ago#63
FabuIous posted...
lol i played through the game at 120 fps @ 120 refresh rate on 1080p 1920x1080 max settings. why are all these idiots who've never experienced anything higher than 60 fps acting all high and mighty?'

anyone whos content with 60 fps is holding back the industry.


calling the kettle black much?
~choose death~

User Info: Honey-Boy

Honey-Boy
4 years ago#64
FabuIous posted...
lol i played through the game at 120 fps @ 120 refresh rate on 1080p 1920x1080 max settings. why are all these idiots who've never experienced anything higher than 60 fps acting all high and mighty?'

anyone whos content with 60 fps is holding back the industry.


even if you got the game to run 240 fps, it wont fix the awful gameplay and terrible story/acting.
~choose death~

User Info: ScreamingMidget

ScreamingMidget
4 years ago#65
FabuIous posted...
lol i played through the game at 120 fps @ 120 refresh rate on 1080p 1920x1080 max settings. why are all these idiots who've never experienced anything higher than 60 fps acting all high and mighty?'

anyone whos content with 60 fps is holding back the industry.


You are holding back the industry by supporting DmC.

User Info: SHMYazoo

SHMYazoo
4 years ago#66
Honey-Boy posted...
why couldnt they get the console versions of this game to run at 60 fps?

why did they insist on using the awful unreal engine?

MGR looks just as good (if not better) and it runs at 60 fps AND had the awesome bonus of allowing the player to slice up the geometry and enemy characters dynamically.

instead, NT decided to focus on mocap and further push games and game development into the wrong direction, lolshakespeare.

they had 3 times the development time as PG, and this was the best they can do?
and the games are even the same length too.


"MGR looks just as good"

Stopped reading right there. MGR has early PS3 graphics at best. Understandable due to the cutting mechanic, but please, let's not lose our heads.
Aion is just like all other WoW clones, I mean, the Mage in Aion has a Fireball spell and can make Portals. WoW ANYONE??? - Aion Boards

User Info: ramzariot

ramzariot
4 years ago#67
SHMYazoo posted...
"MGR looks just as good"

Stopped reading right there. MGR has early PS3 graphics at best. Understandable due to the cutting mechanic, but please, let's not lose our heads.


It's preferable to make them lose their left hand.
I grow tired of the foolish foolery of foolish fools.

User Info: SSJ_Jin

SSJ_Jin
4 years ago#68
SHMYazoo posted...
Honey-Boy posted...
why couldnt they get the console versions of this game to run at 60 fps?

why did they insist on using the awful unreal engine?

MGR looks just as good (if not better) and it runs at 60 fps AND had the awesome bonus of allowing the player to slice up the geometry and enemy characters dynamically.

instead, NT decided to focus on mocap and further push games and game development into the wrong direction, lolshakespeare.

they had 3 times the development time as PG, and this was the best they can do?
and the games are even the same length too.


"MGR looks just as good"

Stopped reading right there. MGR has early PS3 graphics at best. Understandable due to the cutting mechanic, but please, let's not lose our heads.


I see what you did there!

http://i.imgur.com/FLTX0.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7KDXVEOqj8
http://antir.site90.net/

User Info: Honey-Boy

Honey-Boy
4 years ago#69
SHMYazoo posted...
Honey-Boy posted...
why couldnt they get the console versions of this game to run at 60 fps?

why did they insist on using the awful unreal engine?

MGR looks just as good (if not better) and it runs at 60 fps AND had the awesome bonus of allowing the player to slice up the geometry and enemy characters dynamically.

instead, NT decided to focus on mocap and further push games and game development into the wrong direction, lolshakespeare.

they had 3 times the development time as PG, and this was the best they can do?
and the games are even the same length too.


"MGR looks just as good"

Stopped reading right there. MGR has early PS3 graphics at best. Understandable due to the cutting mechanic, but please, let's not lose our heads.


the brain storage room is pretty breath taking.
the japanese pagoda floor in the world marshall building was also visually striking.
all those wild particle effects that flurry about when you are fighting a dozen or so enemies... gorgeous.
the details and moving parts on raiden and the larger mecha enemies are pretty amazing.
the layers and depth of damage done to the mg ray is also pretty amazing.
the insides of the enemies that get cut... incredible detail.

to say that this looks like a early ps3 game is unfair to the artists who clearly put alot of effort into this and still managed to get this thing to run at 60 fps while DmC dosent even have the level of environmental interactivity or details that MGR has some how has to be stuck at 30 fps.
~choose death~

User Info: SHMYazoo

SHMYazoo
4 years ago#70
Honey-Boy posted...
SHMYazoo posted...
Honey-Boy posted...
why couldnt they get the console versions of this game to run at 60 fps?

why did they insist on using the awful unreal engine?

MGR looks just as good (if not better) and it runs at 60 fps AND had the awesome bonus of allowing the player to slice up the geometry and enemy characters dynamically.

instead, NT decided to focus on mocap and further push games and game development into the wrong direction, lolshakespeare.

they had 3 times the development time as PG, and this was the best they can do?
and the games are even the same length too.


"MGR looks just as good"

Stopped reading right there. MGR has early PS3 graphics at best. Understandable due to the cutting mechanic, but please, let's not lose our heads.


the brain storage room is pretty breath taking.
the japanese pagoda floor in the world marshall building was also visually striking.
all those wild particle effects that flurry about when you are fighting a dozen or so enemies... gorgeous.
the details and moving parts on raiden and the larger mecha enemies are pretty amazing.
the layers and depth of damage done to the mg ray is also pretty amazing.
the insides of the enemies that get cut... incredible detail.

to say that this looks like a early ps3 game is unfair to the artists who clearly put alot of effort into this and still managed to get this thing to run at 60 fps while DmC dosent even have the level of environmental interactivity or details that MGR has some how has to be stuck at 30 fps.


Oh boy, here's another one that thinks MGR looks better than DmC. Moving along...
Aion is just like all other WoW clones, I mean, the Mage in Aion has a Fireball spell and can make Portals. WoW ANYONE??? - Aion Boards

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived