Nice to see some familiar names on the board that I recall from when we were all discussing the RE5 hype...
And still the arguement rages on of the old skool VS new
I think the main problem I have with people saying RE4 is the best RE. Is.. it's not resident evil.. in the slightest.
You may have preferred it to the older titles, but it still isn't in it's core, anything RE related.
Now if you wanted to compare which is better between RE4 n 5 I would understand because they both have the 'new-gen' RE formula.
Here's an example. All the other RE games before 4 are Windows.
And RE4 is Mac... You wouldn't say Mac is the best windows system would you? It has nothing to do with windows.
I hope someones understands my point and I hope those that don't take a good look in the mirror and asks themselves if they were even born when the first RE was released. Thank you for your time. Peace out!
--"how is it bad aiming? re4 was revolutionary...and 5 just improved on it. just because it not like the classic bad camera angle/bad controls oldschool games? not hating on the classics, they were great..but RE is never gona be like that again."--
It was bad aiming because you had to do it. That wasn't as fun as the classic aiming. That is one of the biggest things that needs to go back. Classics had far from bad camera angles, RE4/5 has the terrible angle. It is set behind the character the entire game! And the Controls out side of Aiming are the same as the new and Classic games.
You have a pretty ***** grasp on what the fans want. I'm complaining because I wasn't whining for Zombies, I wanted No more stupid Aiming No more bad Camera Angels and backtracking.
how is it bad aiming? re4 was revolutionary...and 5 just improved on it. just because it not like the classic bad camera angle/bad controls oldschool games? not hating on the classics, they were great..but RE is never gona be like that again.
and thankfully so
"This is good... isn't it?" - Big Boss https://www.playfire.com/DivineSnake