> false advertising > repeated objectives in diff. campaigns as an excuse for lengthy crossover campaigns (opinion) > new characters are lame (opinion) > no merchant/weapon shop, all weapons are almost specialised > dumb overused irrelevant QTEs > stupid story > worse graphics than RE5 > etc. etc.
I played 4 and I can't judge 6 other than what I've seen of it.
The topic is about why is RE6 getting so much hate, so then don't post in it if you havn't played it, instead you throw your usual "i hate Re4" crap in every single damn topic that talks about RE6, everyone knows you hate RE4 you're entitled to your opinion, but no one cares to hear about it every time they read a topic, surley even you get tired of that dumb crap eventually.
"I'm sorry squeeky, it's just a game, you got to get before you get got"
What I don't understand is why people bash on this for being too actiony not enough horror, when it had more horror and 'resident evil' atmosphere elements than re5 did. This one also has puzzles AND backtracking.
If re5 had these controls, it would feel just like re6, with less explosions.
And off topic, am I the only one who thinks the re5 beta was probably one of the best story ideas? And that if the game wasn't in africa, it would have probably been an amazing resident evil game.
I agree with this one so much. Yes, I love beta story. Felt more RE than the RE3.5...
"How about you come down here and I'll show you"- Ada Wong to Derek Simmons (RE6) "I came to win"-Fly