The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Besides, I'm not saying it would definitely hurt the singleplayer, just that it's a possibility that some attention would be diverted, which, as I see 0 return, I'm not willing to risk. Obviously I understand if others are, that's absolutely fine if you do want it.

Since I though Oblivion was garbage and expect Skyrim to be the same, from my perspective co-op can't ruin anything.
---
Xbox Live GT: Topher2006

live to me is pointless when all i can do is hit the casino's and get my *** plastered with my buds at the bar xD

i vote no though. co op would be stupid. split screen would confuse me
---
I watch you every day and night; in your sleep, when your with your girlfriend in bed, when your in the shower, and most importantly when your working.

In the realm of co-op difficult, should it not be the players' choice? Give a "vote for difficult" option in game. Obviously normal or lower in terms of Oblivion's difficult would be a push over with 4 players, but I found hard and very hard to be excruciating since you had to strategize in real time and pretty much one body hit would either hit for a third of your health, considering you were playing fairly, had not yet reached the end-game and were not exploiting glitches, or would open you up for more punishment. If you were to play co-op constantly on very hard, you could have a challenging experience even with every standard group archetype being filled, as I personally like it being so in RPGs.

If a group of friends want to just blow the enemies away on easy, what does it matter to you? Unless they add some sort of unnecessary leaderboard, you probably won't even know.

In a side note, you graphics whores need to settle down. It's not graphics that make the game and I doubt the graphics will be effected too greatly in the first place if co-op was to be added.
---
GT: SpArTaN2567
Pretty Big Z: "Black holes produce kittens!"