Jin_OniPosted 12/13/2012 11:39:11 AM | [This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator] |
suksassPosted 12/13/2012 11:41:18 AM | EmperorCarnate posted...This topic included. You got anything better to do? Yeah,didn't think so. |
notSFFPosted 12/13/2012 11:49:07 AM | TheBestFaller posted...Because Bethesda made a compelling conflict that doesn't have a clear cut "right" and "wrong" side? This, pretty much. I'm a staunch Empire supporter, and even I'll admit the Stormcloaks have a few good people in their ranks, and they do have a few good points. |
Gaming_EsquirePosted 12/13/2012 11:49:37 AM | TheBestFaller posted...Because Bethesda made a compelling conflict that doesn't have a clear cut "right" and "wrong" side? --- myroommatetakesbaths.org |
XXXFLUFFPosted 12/13/2012 11:58:41 AM | I enjoy these topics. I love the way people take it really seriously, when it is a bunch of fictional idiots all as bad as each other!
I favour the Stormcloaks because I hate the Thalmor, and yes this is a very short-term view but hey, war has not yet been declared so I cannot help the Empire fight the Thalmor.
I always assumed I would succeed Ulfric and lead the Stormcloaks to a more moderate, open minded view of the world. The long game... --- If you try to fail and succeed, what happened? If a turtle has no shell is it naked or homeless? |
Cast_SupremacyPosted 12/13/2012 12:09:58 PM | notSFF posted...TheBestFaller posted...
Because Bethesda made a compelling conflict that doesn't have a clear cut "right" and "wrong" side?
This, pretty much. I'm a staunch Empire supporter, and even I'll admit the Stormcloaks have a few good people in their ranks, and they do have a few good points. Yup, pretty much this for me. I favour the Imperials, but i can see points on both sides. Not be be that guy, but if only the quests in the civil war had been a little bit better, or a bit longer. You can do them all in no time over a couple of hours The deciding factor for me sometimes has been which Jarls I'd oust. i can't stand the Imperial side Jarl Skald the Elder in Dawnstar, but I love Idgrod Ravencrone in Morthal. Also, thralling Ulfric can be pretty fun, haha. He doesn't have much longevity as he wears clothes, but the shouts are a plus |
20ME2cmpnvetPosted 12/13/2012 12:14:36 PM | Civil War and Parthy/Blades conundrum are really the only 2 items in Skyrim people will debate and go to war over. --- I used to be Commander Shepard, then I took a plothole in the knee. "This Forum has gone 0 days without a Star Wars Reference." |
LockeadonPosted 12/13/2012 12:15:41 PM | the answer is cheesey death scenes.
maybe --- everytime i think i've seen it all... someone does something stupider |
suksassPosted 12/13/2012 12:18:12 PM | Cast_Supremacy posted...notSFF posted...
TheBestFaller posted...
Because Bethesda made a compelling conflict that doesn't have a clear cut "right" and "wrong" side?
This, pretty much. I'm a staunch Empire supporter, and even I'll admit the Stormcloaks have a few good people in their ranks, and they do have a few good points.
Yup, pretty much this for me. I favour the Imperials, but i can see points on both sides. Not be be that guy, but if only the quests in the civil war had been a little bit better, or a bit longer. You can do them all in no time over a couple of hours
The deciding factor for me sometimes has been which Jarls I'd oust. i can't stand the Imperial side Jarl Skald the Elder in Dawnstar, but I love Idgrod Ravencrone in Morthal.
Also, thralling Ulfric can be pretty fun, haha. He doesn't have much longevity as he wears clothes, but the shouts are a plus Wait, isn't Dawnstar suporting Ulfric in the begining? |
notSFFPosted 12/13/2012 12:22:11 PM | Yeah, Skald is the Stormcloak Jarl of Dawnstar.
He probably meant Siddger. |