gransPosted 4/24/2011 3:06:40 PM | You are right, frame rate is unacceptable, especially since the n64 version performed better. Still better than ps1 though. Looks better than ps1 as well. The issue here is that the 3ds is very powerful, more than even dreamcast or ps2. So there's no excuse for the clear lack of effort in this port. In addition to the unstable frame rate, they also removed the dynamic lighting from the dreamcast and even n64 versions.
However, the game is still playable and far better than the ds port. --- NEVER judge a game you have not played. -Granville |
DJ_NarioPosted 4/28/2011 8:58:33 PM | Yeah, I'm disappointed that the game doesn't run in 60fps like the Dreamcast version, but at least it's better than the DS version. --- Xbox Live Gamertag: DJ Nario |