more vita sales analysis "Sony admits PS Vita is currently a failure"

#71LockeMonsterPosted 2/11/2013 4:57:49 AM
MarkCohenBros posted...
kingofall214 posted...
LockeMonster posted...

ROFL, busted!


All he did was make a false quote. He didn't source it and since that is blatant trolling I marked it as such.

fakequote posted...
I am making a fake quote


http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620272-playstation-vita/65388953/733801140

You were saying?

Now source up or shut up.


Yep, still busted.
---
"Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids."
#72KAMMYqueenPosted 2/11/2013 5:05:36 AM
EvilSock1990 posted...
http://i.imgur.com/XRa82.gif


you got any popcorn?
---
KAMMY KOOPA and baby kammy koopa for Super Smash Bros
U
#73kingofall214Posted 2/11/2013 5:36:09 AM(edited)
MarkCohenBros posted...
kingofall214 posted...
LockeMonster posted...

ROFL, busted!


All he did was make a false quote. He didn't source it and since that is blatant trolling I marked it as such.

fakequote posted...
I am making a fake quote


http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620272-playstation-vita/65388953/733801140

You were saying?

Now source up or shut up.


I stand corrected. I did not mean that. Nether did i argue about that claim for the next 100 posts.

Here is the actual topic

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620272-playstation-vita/65388953?page=1

It was post 54 that i made that claim.

I did not argue about that as no one corrected me in that topic.

So you are still wrong with you claim that I argued about the stock when in reality I was arguing the profits made on the vita.

Again just because a site is more important then others doesn't mean they don't spin news. They are clearly spinning the news as no other site is claiming "sony admits ps vita is currently a failure"

That is a false statement. End of story. I don't care if it was the wall street journal that said it it is still spinning the news.

And yeah when you engage someone in a debate you don't usually disappear for over an hour without letting the person you are debating know. A simple "I will be back later" will suffice.

And yeah I posted a transcript. You know, of the actual meeting. Crazy I know.
Control +F on entire transcript
fail

0 Hits.
---
http://psnprofiles.com/kingofall214
#74supremeblasterPosted 2/11/2013 5:31:35 AM
kingofall214 posted...
MarkCohenBros posted...
kingofall214 posted...
LockeMonster posted...

ROFL, busted!


All he did was make a false quote. He didn't source it and since that is blatant trolling I marked it as such.

fakequote posted...
I am making a fake quote


http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620272-playstation-vita/65388953/733801140

You were saying?

Now source up or shut up.


I stand corrected. I did not mean that. Nether did i argue about that claim for the next 100 posts.

Here is the actual topic

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620272-playstation-vita/65388953?page=1

It was post 54 that i made that claim.

I did not argue about that as no one corrected me in that topic.

So you are still wrong with you claim that I argued about the stock when in reality I was arguing the profits made on the vita.

Again just because a site is more important then others doesn't mean they don't spin news. They are clearly spinning the news as no other site is claiming "sony admits ps vita is currently a failure"

That is a false statement. End of story. I don't care if it was the wall street journal that said it it is still spinning the news.

And yeah when you engage someone in a debate you don't usually disappear for over an hour without letting the person you are debating know. A simple "I will be back later" will suffice.


You're embarassing yourself, just leave already....
#75MarkCohenBrosPosted 2/11/2013 5:40:12 AM
king of fail said:
I stand corrected. I did not mean that. Nether did i argue about that claim for the next 100 posts.

Here is the actual topic

http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/620272-playstation-vita/65388953?page=1

It was post 54 that i made that claim.

I did not argue about that as no one corrected me in that topic.

So you are still wrong with you claim that I argued about the stock when in reality I was arguing the profits made on the vita.

lol, this guy just loves to make an ass out of himself. Dude, everything you said in that topic was straight up hot garbage. You even confirmed that you still don't get the thing about being in the black, saying that Sony will have more cash then debt in March. NO THEY WON'T

Again just because a site is more important then others doesn't mean they don't spin news. They are clearly spinning the news as no other site is claiming "sony admits ps vita is currently a failure"


Nope. Source up or shut up with your conspiracy theory crap. Learn what an analysis is.

Magazine and video game sites don't analyze at that level, they merely report.
That is a false statement. End of story. I don't care if it was the wall street journal that said it it is still spinning the news.

Source up or shut up. No source = no credibility
And yeah when you engage someone in a debate you don't usually disappear for over an hour without letting the person you are debating know. A simple "I will be back later" will suffice.

lmfao, wtf are you smoking? I respond when I feel like it, and don't sit on the computer refreshing for a reply like you.

And yeah I posted a transcript. You know, of the actual meeting. Crazy I know.
Control +F on entire transcript
fail

0 Hits.

You still don't understand what an analysis is, do you?
#76kingofall214Posted 2/11/2013 5:42:57 AM
supremeblaster posted...

You're embarassing yourself, just leave already....


A man must be big enough to admit his mistakes, smart enough to profit from them, and strong enough to correct them.
John C. Maxwell
---
http://psnprofiles.com/kingofall214
#77HornyLevelPosted 2/11/2013 5:48:01 AM
lol @ kingofall falling all over his face like in every topic. I feel bad for him sometimes.
---
I rock hoes, ya'll rock fellas.
#78GamenamebullyPosted 2/11/2013 5:51:58 AM(edited)
Anyways I still like my Vita and even though the sales are worrysome, it's not my #1 concern. My #1 concern is just getting the games I need for it which are already released.
---
The Only Sane Gamer.
PSN Name: Gamenamebully
#79kingofall214Posted 2/11/2013 5:57:08 AM(edited)
MarkCohenBros posted...

lol, this guy just loves to make an ass out of himself. Dude, everything you said in that topic was straight up hot garbage. You even confirmed that you still don't get the thing about being in the black, saying that Sony will have more cash then debt in March. NO THEY WON'T

Again just because a site is more important then others doesn't mean they don't spin news. They are clearly spinning the news as no other site is claiming "sony admits ps vita is currently a failure"


Nope. Source up or shut up with your conspiracy theory crap. Learn what an analysis is.

Magazine and video game sites don't analyze at that level, they merely report.
That is a false statement. End of story. I don't care if it was the wall street journal that said it it is still spinning the news.

Source up or shut up. No source = no credibility
And yeah when you engage someone in a debate you don't usually disappear for over an hour without letting the person you are debating know. A simple "I will be back later" will suffice.

lmfao, wtf are you smoking? I respond when I feel like it, and don't sit on the computer refreshing for a reply like you.

And yeah I posted a transcript. You know, of the actual meeting. Crazy I know.
Control +F on entire transcript
fail

0 Hits.

You still don't understand what an analysis is, do you?


Sony never admits the vita is a failure. End of subject. Sure you can say what they said legitimately by saying it's an analysis not a quote but it is still a mis-leading and incorrect. It's not a conspiracy theory at all it happens all the time.

Sony will have more cash then debt in march. End of subject on that. I am not going to argue about this because it's ridiculous to think otherwise. The difference between the cash and debt is <1 billion.

What exactly do you want me to source? Another person saying what I am saying that the title of that article is misleading and border line incorrect? No news site is going to make an article about that as everyone in news does this.

I am not arguing about whatever there predictions are. I don't care about that. What I care about is making a misleading title for an article that leaves a person who reads just the topic thinking that Sony actually said that. They didn't. They could of made the topic title "Our analysis: Sony is admitting the vita is currently a failure." If they had done this I wouldn't of cared.

Then don't join lengthy discussions on the internet as no one will want to argue with you if you keep disappearing for hours at a time. I am not saying you have to respond right this second. But 20 minutes should be more than enough.

Simply put if you disappear for more than an hour then you can't come back and say someone else ran away. They didn't run away they went elsewhere as they aren't going to wait for you to respond.

Since the quotes are over 5 blocks I am removing my first quote.
---
http://psnprofiles.com/kingofall214
#80Black_ArchPosted 2/11/2013 6:02:25 AM
Damn kingofail214, it's like you don't know when to give up. You lost spectacularly, everything you say going forward is basically extra nails in the coffin.
---
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Give me Liberty, or give me Death! - Patrick Henry