Original Vita vs Vita Slim

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation Vita
  3. Original Vita vs Vita Slim

User Info: Dieselzone32450

Dieselzone32450
3 years ago#1
Anyone here who has both? If so, which do you currently prefer and why? Any noticeable differences you've noticed between them when playing games?

Also, how much better is the battery life of the slim, compared to the original?
If you take the Sensui hype as 100% true then, 20% of Sensui =SSJ3 Goku. -Knowledge King

User Info: CressDXX

CressDXX
3 years ago#2
The orginal Vita has 4-5 hours.
Vita slim has 5-6 hours.
3DS FC: 1521-3255-0719 Dream Adress 7800-2190-7418
XBOX360 GT: CressDX

User Info: JP_Sartre

JP_Sartre
3 years ago#3
Doesn't Slim have 100mb internal memory?
"The Virtual Boy didn't fail. We failed the Virtual Boy"
-fallenKlNG

User Info: Dark_Oblivion2

Dark_Oblivion2
3 years ago#4
JP_Sartre posted...
Doesn't Slim have 100mb internal memory?


It's 1GB not 100MB.
Even the most primitive society has an innate respect for the insane.

User Info: zandm7

zandm7
3 years ago#5
CressDXX posted...
The orginal Vita has 4-5 hours.
Vita slim has 5-6 hours.


Do you actually have the Slim or not? Because Engadget's review claimed 8 hours of continuous battery life while playing Vita games...and I STILL don't know if that mark is accurate.
The Epic Shadow Meltdown Followed By Bromances (The Army Of Three) And The Vodka Showdown: THE BATTLE TO 500: http://goo.gl/ZedBUq
PSN: zandm7, Steam: zandm7

User Info: stargazer64

stargazer64
3 years ago#6
zandm7 posted...
CressDXX posted...
The orginal Vita has 4-5 hours.
Vita slim has 5-6 hours.


Do you actually have the Slim or not? Because Engadget's review claimed 8 hours of continuous battery life while playing Vita games...and I STILL don't know if that mark is accurate.


Based on random impressions I've read, the 8 hour mark is reported pretty often.

Then again a lot of people reported 6 hours with the original and I don't get that.
I've accepted Shahid as lord of indies and savior of the Vita. If you accept and believe this 100%, put this in your sig.

User Info: jakx102

jakx102
3 years ago#7
I like my vita 2000 more. The battery has GREATLY improved. I'd say 6-7 hours total. It has 1gb onboard memory but can't be used if a memory card is being used. The LCD is just as good as the oled. Honestly they look the same in person but when filmed with a camera they look different. I love how slim the 2000 is but the touchpad has been shrunk which will take some getting used to

User Info: yipeeyahoo

yipeeyahoo
3 years ago#8
jakx102 posted...
I like my vita 2000 more. The battery has GREATLY improved. I'd say 6-7 hours total. It has 1gb onboard memory but can't be used if a memory card is being used. The LCD is just as good as the oled. Honestly they look the same in person but when filmed with a camera they look different. I love how slim the 2000 is but the touchpad has been shrunk which will take some getting used to


^This :) The LCD screen is as good as the OLED, it is just that the colors are a bit different
PSN:Yipeeyahoo
You are welcome to add me :D

User Info: HeartTranquil

HeartTranquil
3 years ago#9
In balance, after weighing for myself ALL the factors, I really like my Vita 2000.

I think with each iteration Sony's portable handhelds have OVERALL improved.

User Info: GamerRaf

GamerRaf
3 years ago#10
I want a Slim model with an OLED screen. The screen is a deal breaker itself.
"Lets release a console with no games and no marketing." -Satoru Iwata, 2012
  1. Boards
  2. PlayStation Vita
  3. Original Vita vs Vita Slim

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived