IGN posted a **** review with all sorts of wrong info yet again.

#21SonyHoundDawgPosted 1/11/2013 9:28:30 PM
Ign review sounds accurate to me. This game was a good idea but it just didn't turn out good. The only positivr
E is thirty dolla, don't feel as ripped off. Between fuzy graphics and all the technical problems matchmaking has, which wasn't even mentioned in the review, I think ign scored a bit to high. Bad matchmaking on a mainly multiplaer game is horrid
#22sworderPosted 1/11/2013 9:37:18 PM(edited)
SonyHoundDawg posted...
Bad matchmaking on a mainly multiplaer game is horrid


Yeah, you're gonna have to explain yourself. What exactly is bad about the matchmaking? There's few people online, there's usually like 3 open lobbies in team deathmatch and battle royale and like 1 in every other game mode.

What is bad about it? That you get a notification telling you the lobby is full (rarely happens) and you need to try again? Please.
#23GujinKamiPosted 1/11/2013 9:44:47 PM
Platinum must not have payed them off.
---
~Gujin
http://i39.tinypic.com/v830c3.jpg http://i47.tinypic.com/op7mvk.jpg http://i49.tinypic.com/23j1t9z.gif
#24necro00Posted 1/11/2013 9:48:13 PM
the game sucks
#25gamester091Posted 1/11/2013 9:54:57 PM
sworder posted...
SonyHoundDawg posted...
Bad matchmaking on a mainly multiplaer game is horrid


Yeah, you're gonna have to explain yourself. What exactly is bad about the matchmaking? There's few people online, there's usually like 3 open lobbies in team deathmatch and battle royale and like 1 in every other game mode.

What is bad about it? That you get a notification telling you the lobby is full (rarely happens) and you need to try again? Please.


Yeah honestly. Ive never had matchmaking problems, other then the game not starting, even if the lobby is full and everyone is ready. While it takes people a little longer to join a battle royal, every other mode is instant (i think its due to all the players possibly)
---
That's like filling your house with bears and then since the bears are a problem, filling it with tigers to fight them. -Faust_8
#26GujinKamiPosted 1/11/2013 9:57:30 PM
It's a $30 title with good gameplay and solid multiplayer (the only real time you'll have an issue is with large Battle Royale lobbies)

5/10 is asinine.
---
~Gujin
http://i39.tinypic.com/v830c3.jpg http://i47.tinypic.com/op7mvk.jpg http://i49.tinypic.com/23j1t9z.gif
#27DarquePosted 1/11/2013 9:59:48 PM
People still take IGN seriously?
---
Jill Valentine > You
#28gamester091Posted 1/11/2013 10:02:54 PM
Darque posted...
People still take IGN seriously?


Honestly.....
---
That's like filling your house with bears and then since the bears are a problem, filling it with tigers to fight them. -Faust_8
#29WhiteBaitKentPosted 1/11/2013 10:02:55 PM
It's funny how people complain about the graphics. When they were developing the game, they did a test of putting 16 Bayonetta models into an empty field which they could.nt even do due to lack of memory capacity. That's basically what this game is, up to 16 "main" charcters on an arena at one time. They had to make a lot of compromises with the graphics to get all these unique character designs beating the crap out of each other, and ATEs, on a playing field to run smoothly.

If they had the budget of, say, a cod game, they'd most likely have better graphics but seeing as how its the underdogs Platinum, a truly underrated company, that wasn't possible.
---
Can't spell ignorant without "IGN"!!!
#30leopoldsharkPosted 1/11/2013 10:20:17 PM
Being able to zoom in and ogle the female character models is enough to warrant this game a 9/10 at least. Couple problems I have with it is in the story mode the characters aren't lip synced properly during the dialogue scenes and the lockon doesn't work when facing large amounts of enemies (you start going in random directions, it's fairly disorienting).