They gotta save some wepz for Battlefield 4. --- http://i.imgur.com/qvtbL.jpeg http://i.imgur.com/xs6YK.jpg http://imgur.com/SbmhS.jpg http://imgur.com/g8uN6.jpg R3D.
#32Scarlet-RavenPosted 2/4/2013 7:16:27 AM
It isn't really bothering me. I only know how not to use the defibs anyway.
--- HaVoK Gaming http://havok-bf3.enjin.com/ Add a rifle scope and you'll be fine
#33Scorex_VIIPosted 2/5/2013 3:37:15 AM
Why do people want more variety? The major part of BF3 players play almost just assault and then either hog the M16 or AEK. There are plenty guns out there, but most are just affraid to try new things. --- Growing on you, right? [PSK] Poder Lusitano!
#34Digital_BulletPosted 2/8/2013 8:55:52 AM
A WW2 weapons pack would have been sweet. The kicker would be very few or no attachments at all.
M1 Thompson in .45 ACP - This was my favorite weapon in BC2
M1 Garand in 30.06 - highly accurate and powerful but only an eight round capacity
A modernized MG42 (MG3) - would kick so much ass with a bipod
Mosin Nagant - Snipers would love it
MP40 - Less damage but much faster fire rate than the Thompson
BAR - Heavy damage, medium rate of fire, small capacity. Also comes with a bipod.
Panzerfaust - Disposable anti tank projectile
M1 Carbine - Medium damage, high accuracy, decent capacity
Sten SMG - Same as the Thompson and MP40 but a higher capacity. Can add a silencer. --- A day without blood is like a day without sunshine.
#35CzarcasmPosted 2/8/2013 10:29:49 AM
Why do people want more variety? The major part of BF3 players play almost just assault and then either hog the M16 or AEK. There are plenty guns out there, but most are just affraid to try new things.
This. I'm trying to master every primary (and maybe secondary) weapon, and I see the vast majority of plays using the same 5 or 6 weapons. I see a ton of level 100 scrubs with 40+ assault stars and a maxed out m16/AEK/P90 who undoubtedly leave the game once the map switches to anything other than Metro, Seine, or Bazaar. --- http://tinyurl.com/8rtl78h