Much like Liberation, it's good but has a lot of flaws. If it came out 5 years ago it'd be monumental. As is, it feels a little dated.
Desmond's story conclusion is weak, Connor's arc is weird and contrived, there's a ton of sidequests with no real merit to them (you can craft items to sell but they are always less valuable than their base components, what?) it's glitched out the ass and constantly reveals stuff it is not meant to; I got spoilered on a pretty huge plot development by an ingame character biography popping up too early. Connor can attack forts and raise the American flag long before the American flag exists.
I just killed a bear with the Hidden Blade I don't have yet.
Again, like Liberation, I love it. But it is rough around the edges in a way ACII was not.
Oh no, there goes Toh-kee-yoh! http://www.rockband.com/users/Dark_Raven_X
I enjoyed this game thoroughly. And I have put in roughly 6-10 more hours than into the earlier games. The new setting is done very well. In my book AC2 is still slightly better. But maybe there is some bias to that because the jump from AC1 to AC2 was so large.
The ending however, yeah.. Much more dissatisfying than in the earlier games I must say.
Nah its just GameFAQs being vocal again. The game isn't without its issues but what new game is?
I'd put it on par with AC2, way ahead of BH and RV
Pretty much this. It's my personal favorite game in the series, but it's also the only one that I experienced glitches in. None were completely game-breaking, and they eventually just stopped for the majority of the game. That was just my own experience, though.
I just want Card Sagas Wars. Seriously, I'd do anything, just give me Card Sagas Wars. Please. PSN:ChocoboDreams