New to Assassin's Creed
- Topic Archived
Both games are great and I recommend getting them. You'll be confused with the present day story though if you skip over Brotherhood and Revelations (aka AC 2.5, AC 2.75).
I originally got bored with the first AC but still finished it and wanted more of the story. AC2 adds a lot of improvements and mixes up the gameplay. Each game since 2 has added more controls and freedom to the player.
If you can buy all of them or at least rent, watch a playthrough or something to catch up with the story then you should.
If I were you, I'd just suck it up and play the first one til the end. For me, even if a game isn't as strong as its sucessor, I just can't see myself playing a sequel without experiencing its predecessor, whether or not its story orientation is strongly, or loosely affiliated.
To answer your question if it'll be worth the buy or not.. Hmm.. Sure, I'd hit it.
"This issue doesnt concern you. Dont Bother me. Die..."
IMO, AC had a good story line. But the controls were less than stellar. You can find it used at some store for cheap.
AC2 was longer than AC3 and combat was better. You can probably download AC2 from PSN w/ all the DLC's for cheap. Look for the bundle on PSN.
I played AC3 and had a okay time. But I'm still on the fences when it comes to saying it was worth it. Only the naval battles were awesome IMO. The rest of the game fell short for me.
If I had to do it again I would wait and buy AC3 used.
I would skip both and get Sleeping Dogs if you liked the Batman games.
You can watch just the stories for these games on youtube. Its about 4-5 hours long per game. The series does get a lot better with 2 (1 is very repititive and each game gets a little better at being more organic as far as the flow of game play), but it may be worth watching the cut scenes for the first one to get a grasp on the story.
I vote get the Ezio Trilogy that came out not too long ago.
Add user to Ignore List after reporting
- Topic Archived