Assassin's Creed III

he really is.
---
honk HONK honk HONK http://i.imgur.com/NztEG.gif. :33 < fus ro paw,

because he's the most believable and flawed of the assassins.

people like ezio because he's a charming ladies man who's extremely self confidant and has the skills to back it up. I.E the kind of guy everyone wants to be. its a power fantasy thing, its why that generic non-character archtype is so widely liked and used in fiction.

so when you compare a flawed yet believable character, to the ideal fantasy man then he's going to come up lacking for alot of people.

I love Connor but I think Ezio is better. Altsir is a horrible character but a good assassin. He is the worst by far
---
Oh sheesh y'all, twas a dream!

Also, what zerobobo said. He's a character you need to actually think about in order to understand.
---
My other pack mule is a wood elf.

Haytham > Ezio >>>>>>>>> Connor > Altaiir

Ezio was far more interesting imo, the only reason I like Connor is because he has all the extra gadgets. He's an annoying character imo, all the other assassins were focused solely on the order, Connor keeps whining about his village all the damn time.

Haytham is by far my favourite character to play as. More interesting and better accent.
---
People who want another SW Battlefront: 213
"Gnarly, you are clearly more educated than me" - OblivionScamp. GT: Charlievil