Red dead redemption by a mile. All of those reason given as to why ac3 hunting is better are just stupid as hell.
It's even more stupid that there are no reasons given as to why RDR has better hunting.
No reason needed. But here's a few anyway.
Dangerous animals are actually dangerous, I don't get qtes which a ten year old couldn't fail.
Actually takes some skill to kill an animal, whereas in ac3 animals runa round in circles making it easy to just stab em.
Any game that makes it this easy to kill an animal by stabbing it should not have its hunting aspect taken seriously.
Shooting animals in RDR really doesn't take much skill at all. And the only animal that was even remotely dangerous was the cougar.
Is this serious? Are people really arguing for AC3 because the hunting is "harder"? Uhhh, i took out a pack of like 8 wolves that were surrounding me one after the other with my hidden blades... It was easy as hell. I even killed the ones that were attacking me from my blind side... just quicktime (A), (B), dead... every kill animation was the same... Not knocking it necessarily, but its definitely not super varied and leagues above RDR, thats for sure. --- I murder threads... http://bbsimg.ngfiles.com/1/24025000/ngbbs4fdb43351294d.jpg