Are people still under the impression Motion controls are more accurate then DA?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Are people still under the impression Motion controls are more accurate then DA?

User Info: the_cajun88

the_cajun88
5 years ago#11
Wait....did you just say 'dual anal?'

Does it take that much more effort to add the -og to the end?
The University of Tennessee FTW
http://i99.photobucket.com/albums/l306/the_cajun88/Josephthesnowman.gif

User Info: tizzywilkillyou

tizzywilkillyou
5 years ago#12
I am a heavy GE007 Wii online player. 95% of the ELITE players in that online community use Wii remote/nunchuck.

Effective hip firing (where there is no lock-on as with aiming down the sights) is SO key to success if you want to compete with the elites in that game. Dual analog just cannot compete, all else being equal, and this has been proven over and over.

And actually the way it works in that game, the DA users DO get a slight sticky reticle for hip firing whereas Wii remote users do NOT. And Wii remote STILL wins.


Dual analog is a diarrhea mess of a control scheme for FPSs which ONLY came about because at the time, motion controls were not feasible, and neither were using mouse/keyboard on a console. That's the only reason. DA FPS control = fail, massively.
Who is John Galt?
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Are people still under the impression Motion controls are more accurate then DA?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived