I don't really care about the size very much. It's nice if it doesn't fill up half of my backpack like the pizza calzone they call the PS3 phat, but it's not a deciding factor when i buy it.
From: WormBoi | #001
Does't this size limit the power of the components? Such as the amount the watts that can produced and space for ventilation of heat?
Nah, that shouldn't be a problem anymore. Let's assume that the U is built pretty much like the Wii in these aspects (power related to technology, price point, etc.). The Wii came out in the 2006 holiday season, so if the U comes out in the 2012 holyday season, that's 6 years in between. According to Moore's law, that means that it would be 8 times as "powerful" as the Wii with the same form factor and price tag of $250.
Moore's law is about transistors in a processor but has shown to be very accurate in most relevant aspects such as actualy processing power, memory, read/write speeds and so on.
Did people enjoy the Wii and now find the Wii U just as appealing because of the small size?
I don't think that's a huge point for most people although i heard that the Japanese care a lot about having sleek electronics (more than Westerners do).
I remember a post from Nintendo stating that their consoles wouldn't have internal HDDs because they risk damage from kids but making the console itself so portable wouldn't help deter kids from messing with it.
I wouldn't worry about damage. It's Nintendo we're talking about here. I guess a big reason why it won't have an internal HDD is because it only increases the price point for something that a lot of people won't use. People that care a lot about this stuff can always just buy an external HDD (or SSD for those that hate loading times). Besides, this is much more confortable. Just attach the thing to an external interface instead of having to open the system for that.
---
3D screens.. how do they work? are they similar to magnets? PS: Please no replies from scientists.. you're always lyin, and gettin me pissed.
~ Mario64DStyle