3 years ago#91
i don't worry about it. They just don't even know that they don't like games.
(Topic Creator)3 years ago#92
Lemmywinks13 posted...DarkZV2Beta posted...And there you go with your angry assumptions again.
Save face? I inspired you to duplicate to take time out of your day to duplicate my post sentence for sentence. I must of hit a little too close to home! Besides...bro, it's Gamefaqs. You must be 12 too be worried about saving face on a message board...in which case I feel bad for debating this stuff with you so I will stop now. Go ahead and write back so you can have the last word. In a few years when you are grown up you will look back and laugh. :)
3 years ago#93
DarkZV2Beta posted...Lemmywinks13 posted...DarkZV2Beta posted...And there you go with your angry assumptions again.
I do that a lot, actually. It's fun.
But, when you consider that you've probably spent more time replying to me in this topic than I've spent replying to you and making that topic combined...
And all to get the last word. How silly.
AMD CACHING = NOT YET FINISHED
3 years ago#94
Agree with you on 1.
Sony keeps churning out God of War games and Microsoft can't stop with the Gears and Halo games.
To be fair to those companies it isn't anything new. Capcom did it with Mega Man, Konami has done it with Silent Hill/MGS/Castlevania and many other companies do the same thing.
Also agree with 2.
The consoles really need to adopt the superior format found on PC for downloads, pricing and updates.
As for 3, in general, numbered scores ar absolutely worthless except for fueling fanboy wars. What actually matters and tells you about the game is the written review, the actual words, the things people don't read.
Their exists no objective standard by which an "8" is exactly this and all reviewers follow this format. The problem is a score makes things simple (and most people don't like to actually think or read) and as long as a more simple (and completely worthless) option exists, people will continue to use it.
Time will tell how the Wii U handles the first 2 issues. We're never going to get away from what's called a franchise so just ignore it.
If history is to change, let it change. If the world is to be destroyed, so be it. If my fate is to die, I must simply laugh.
3 years ago#95
Big ******* surprise.
GameFAQS users are far too sensitive.
3 years ago#96
Lemmywinks13 posted...And you are spoiled by not being satisfied with either Mario Galaxy (regarded as two of the best games EVER!), or any of the Metroid Prime games. Unless you of course are not counting the Wii as current gen.
GameFAQS users are far too sensitive.
3 years ago#97
"Almost as if people look forward to looking forward to games more than actually playing them."
Unfortunately if you own a PC you have to devote some time for testing or troubleshooting.
A GPU can be more complex and powerful than the mobo and cpu combined.
It has so many parameters that you want to try every aspect of it. Games are the best candidate.
I do this too. I test some games there too, but with hundreds of them i can only play 2 or 3 the most.
I am always worried too that the game or pc might crash anytime.
Besides there is no need for benchmarking, i can run most games at max settings.
A console allows you to focus just on games, but there may be also obsession with updates. Patches, memcards, external disks etc
Q.You want so see some other stuff? What Console? A.Console? Q.What platform? A.Uh, Moral Turpitude?
Q.PC it is, then.
|More topics from this board...|
|Other M - Are gamers ready for something more complex?||Kuribo4||181||5/29 8:43AM|
|I'm glad the new generation of gamers is able to experience Battle Network 4.||Dark_SilverX||6||5/29 5:43AM|
|Do you think Nintendo cattering to kiddie gamers is the reason of their fall??||IloveslimesOMG||77||5/27 3:31PM|
|Splatoon is the ultimate proof that the media/gamers are biased towards Nintendo||abear90||105||5/27 8:43PM|
|Mega Man Zero 3 today!?||RegalX7||7||5/28 7:39PM|