Ninja Gaiden: Razor's Edge review!

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Ninja Gaiden: Razor's Edge review!
3 years ago#101
Awesome, I'm stoked to get this game. The graphics aren't much better than current gen, just touched, which is a good thing but not a great thing
---
"What's more important? That the right man is elected President, or that Star Wars is with people who will protect it most?"
3 years ago#102
Just as I expected.

IT's polished Turd.

It's basically the GOTY version of a crap game. and by GOTY I mean garbage of the year.

This is my advice to new people wanting to buy this game. Get it if you don't mind a bit of mindless hack and slash action with gore. But do NOT let this title dictate what you think of the franchise in general. Games like N1 and even NG2 are light years better than this and are some of the best action games of all time.

It's a shame Hayshi is still at Tecmo. I wish he got fired already.
---
http://s12.postimage.org/8orxdffrv/ps4golden.png
(edited 0 seconds ago)
3 years ago#103
The_Djoker posted...
Just as I expected.

IT's polished Turd.

It's basically the GOTY version of a crap game. and by GOTY I mean garbage of the year.

This is my advice to new people wanting to buy this game. Get it if you don't mind a bit of mindless hack and slash action with gore. But do NOT let this title dictate what you think of the franchise in general. Games like N1 and even NG2 are light years better than this and are some of the best action games of all time.

It's a shame Hayshi is still at Tecmo. I wish he got fired already.


a little over reacting are we?
3 years ago#104
mistermerk posted...
nonexistinghero posted...
PGR3 launched with the 360, PGR4 came a few years later -__-

I think PGR4 still looks great, but the Wii U has launch titles that look better. Sega's All Star Racing game looks better.


I meant 3 but I guess it's personal preference. It's hard to compare the cartoony graphics of Sonic All Star Racing--which do look really good--with a realistic style.


I know it's hard to compare, but it pretty much looks like CG. I'm not even sure how they managed to get the game to look that damn good.
---
Read the mania: http://www.fanfiction.net/~nonexistinghero
In SA2, it's Super Sonic and Hyper Shadow.
3 years ago#105
So far the couple reviews that are out point to this being just as mediocre as the ps3/360 release

Big surprise, I didnt expect them to actually fix the game. It was rooted in the worst QTE saturated gameplay ever. They would have had to rework the gameplay from the ground up to fix it.


Just another crappy Wii U 3rd party cash in
---
Guardian Gamer X
"CE's verbal cruelty is only matched by an eight-armed robot beating multiple baby seals."-PursuitandTie
3 years ago#106
GAMER_X_REVIVAL posted...
So far the couple reviews that are out point to this being just as mediocre as the ps3/360 release

Big surprise, I didnt expect them to actually fix the game. It was rooted in the worst QTE saturated gameplay ever. They would have had to rework the gameplay from the ground up to fix it.


Just another crappy Wii U 3rd party cash in


the gap from scores given is quite large actually between the 2 versions
3 years ago#107
GAMER_X_REVIVAL posted...
So far the couple reviews that are out point to this being just as mediocre as the ps3/360 release

Big surprise, I didnt expect them to actually fix the game. It was rooted in the worst QTE saturated gameplay ever. They would have had to rework the gameplay from the ground up to fix it.


Just another crappy Wii U 3rd party cash in


IGN: Original 3.0 Vs. Wii U 7.6

Same score alright.
---
To err is human, but to really screw things up you need a computer!
IGN: CodenameFox
3 years ago#108
StickMen1090 posted...
GAMER_X_REVIVAL posted...
So far the couple reviews that are out point to this being just as mediocre as the ps3/360 release

Big surprise, I didnt expect them to actually fix the game. It was rooted in the worst QTE saturated gameplay ever. They would have had to rework the gameplay from the ground up to fix it.


Just another crappy Wii U 3rd party cash in


the gap from scores given is quite large actually between the 2 versions


It still didnt manage to even match the metacritic score NG2 Sigma got.

Idk, I watched a livestream of Sigma 1, Sigma 2 and NG3. NG3 really plays like a bag of asses and overall the game just sucks compared to its predecessors.

Wii U buyers I'm sure are going to put on the rose colored glasses to rationalize buying some pretty crappy games to legitimize getting a Wii U, to say the system has a solid launch library. But turds like NG3 and Mass Effect 3 really only hurt the launch lineup. Alot of these 3rd party ports are literally the worst games in their respective series. Sucks for Nintendo, oh well
---
Guardian Gamer X
"CE's verbal cruelty is only matched by an eight-armed robot beating multiple baby seals."-PursuitandTie
3 years ago#109
I think the Wii U score is higher due, to like the reviewer said, he is wearing "launch goggles" when viewing the game.
3 years ago#110
Icecreamdunwich posted...
I think the Wii U score is higher due, to like the reviewer said, he is wearing "launch goggles" when viewing the game.


Even if he didn't have "launch goggles", it probably still be higher than a 3.
---
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls... it tolls for thee." - In memory of Chuck, the wisest boxcar hobo of all time from Telltale's The Walking Dead.
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Ninja Gaiden: Razor's Edge review!

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived