Squished_MarioPosted 11/19/2012 2:17:48 AM | Icecreamdunwich posted...From: lorider25 | #186
Well it looks like, the Wii U has a lot of framerate issues, every reviewer I go to seems to point this out.
A lot of reviewers agree with how I first thought, that the tablet controller is annoying and doesn't revolutionize a damn thing.
The 3rd party games are the same and sometimes look worse than on a Ps3 or Xbox. The controls are set up way different than every other consoles ( Why would they do that?)
The main title (ZombiU) was a flop as far as gameplay mechanics.
As a Nintendo fan (but not a fanboy) I've got to say, I knew this would be a subpar system and I wish the fans would stop denying so hard that it isn't.
It's not the end of the world though. They also still have time before the other next gen systems come out. Maybe they can redeem themselves, but as it stands right now, the system is nothing special.
Indeed, sucks that the fanboys are so crazily devoted though. Agreeing with the TC. People are defending this stuff and it's inexcusable. This launch was a crapstorm. I bought a Wii U by the way, before you decide that everyone in the universe is trolling. --- Part of the Viewmaster_pi's Caln Magna cum laude PSN: VexSilver |
squatch22Posted 11/19/2012 2:18:28 AM | earvcunanan posted...From: Icecreamdunwich | #187
From: lorider25 | #186
Well it looks like, the Wii U has a lot of framerate issues, every reviewer I go to seems to point this out.
A lot of reviewers agree with how I first thought, that the tablet controller is annoying and doesn't revolutionize a damn thing.
The 3rd party games are the same and sometimes look worse than on a Ps3 or Xbox. The controls are set up way different than every other consoles ( Why would they do that?)
The main title (ZombiU) was a flop as far as gameplay mechanics.
As a Nintendo fan (but not a fanboy) I've got to say, I knew this would be a subpar system and I wish the fans would stop denying so hard that it isn't.
It's not the end of the world though. They also still have time before the other next gen systems come out. Maybe they can redeem themselves, but as it stands right now, the system is nothing special.
Indeed, sucks that the fanboys are so crazily devoted though.
To me, it seems like you're devoted to trolling anything Wii U related for some reason. --- LineTroll posted: Mario Galaxy is just like a Sonic game. http://www.jc-news.com/gfx/gaf/lol/nintendo_cycle.png |
Kabuto_YPosted 11/19/2012 2:18:56 AM | See now, I'd be agreeing with this thread if I felt that any other console launch I've been a part of was better. But the games available for my taste are significantly better than what was available for 360 and PS3 at launch, and even several months after launch, too.
I wasn't planning on ever getting ZombiU, either. I hear it works decently well as a horror game, but who wants horror in their zombie games anymore? |
Chico86_basicPosted 11/19/2012 2:59:02 AM | The only framerate issues I ever heard about concerning the WiiU was in Batman Arkham City: Armored Edition live stream play from GiantBomb. Jeff Gerstmann, the guy who will forever be remembered for reviewing Twilight Princess with a score of 8.9/10 said the framerate of that version was terrible. While I can't quite say there were no framerate issues at all because of the stream, I can at least tell the game had far from "terrible" framerate. They talked about like it was almost unplayable or something ("(...)not the version to get."), which is a shame. On top of it the console was running the day one update while they were playing which could translate into some natural delay GiantBomb didn't even think about. Not that I care much about Jeff's opinion but I'm just giving you guys an example of what I see as negative criticism right here. |
LordrvPosted 11/19/2012 3:47:16 AM | LAWL NINTENDOOM'ED CALLED IT WITH THE 3ds right guyz |
Marnex15Posted 11/19/2012 4:36:57 AM | Chico86_basic posted...The only framerate issues I ever heard about concerning the WiiU was in Batman Arkham City: Armored Edition live stream play from GiantBomb. Jeff Gerstmann, the guy who will forever be remembered for reviewing Twilight Princess with a score of 8.9/10 said the framerate of that version was terrible. While I can't quite say there were no framerate issues at all because of the stream, I can at least tell the game had far from "terrible" framerate. They talked about like it was almost unplayable or something ("(...)not the version to get."), which is a shame. On top of it the console was running the day one update while they were playing which could translate into some natural delay GiantBomb didn't even think about. Not that I care much about Jeff's opinion but I'm just giving you guys an example of what I see as negative criticism right here. That's it? Because of one bad port some people here are saying that the Wii U has framerate issues? Christ, so I'm guessing the PS3 also has framerate issues considering Fallout and Skyrim run like ass on it, am I right? --- Official Lord of the Wiinet of LoZ: Skyward Sword | www.zeldawtwii.proboards.com |
legendarylemurPosted 11/19/2012 4:58:03 AM | Aaahh~ Senor is so adorable! <3
---
According to Wikipedia, you don't exist!
Official official. Officially |
Helmsly2008Posted 11/19/2012 4:59:02 AM | Marnex15 posted...I love the part where reviews matter, but only the bad ones. Of course the good reviews were paid off.
Logic. there are people doing the opposite of that too though, Post a good review = proof that the Wii U is amazing. Post a bad review = they are nintendo hating trolls |
Facebook | 
Twitter
