Godly_Goof posted...I give "professional" review sites 0 credibility. I generally check Gfaqs for gamer reviews after about 2 weeks have passed and see the overall verdict based on that.
Most sites are occasionally painfully biased and I just don't trust them anymore
I think the difference between a review site and a gamer review is that the gamer doesn't have any obligation to actually finish the game and explore every feature on it. You will see high reviews for games that haven't been out for a week. And alot of gamer reviews are rather short.
This are some examples of gamer reviews for Zombie U on metacritic:
" 9/10 How in the world this game got a few bad reveiws I will never know!!! The game is fantastic its not like every other zombie game on the market thank goodness!!!!! It stands alone, a truly fun and unique gaming experience!!! Dont let a few false reveiws ruin a truly extraordinary gaining experience for YOU!!!!!!! think for yourself don't let others decide for you!!! if you want a great game its here waiiting 4 you!!!!!!"
"3/10 Overhyped. Underdone. This is a familiar game to many of you. Whack-a-mole! Remember at the arcade -- you hit randomly appearing moles with a bat. This is the same, only with zombies. There is no story to speak of. The graphics and sound design are a let down. And the gameplay is tedious. The horror is calling this a launch title."
"10/10 oh my god this is my first wii u game and its so good the graphics looks great and the sound effects so impressive i recommended this game for any wii u owner"
Gametrailer reviews is my favorite place to go. I trust their video reviews a lot more than most gamer reviews.