Why Wii U is weaker than the 360 and PS3, explained intuitively.

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Why Wii U is weaker than the 360 and PS3, explained intuitively.

User Info: 3D_Shado

3D_Shado
4 years ago#1
What's faster?

1. One guy with 6 arms carrying bricks at 3.2 feet per second
2. Three guys with 2 arms each carrying bricks at 3.2 feet per second
3. Three guys with 1 arm each carrying bricks at 1.24 feet per second

Both 1 and 2 seem equivalent, right? There are 6 arms in total, each carrying the same amount of bricks at the same speed. But with 3, there are half as many arms and they move far slower.

1 and 2 correspond to the PS3 and 360, respectively. The 360 has 3 physical cores, each with 2 logical cores - 3*2 = 6, i.e. 6 things operating in tandem with the same capability. The PS3 has a more unique architecture, with a single core called the PPE acting as a master to 6 slaves called SPEs, that receive and execute instructions independently. Since the PPE is mostly busy controlling the SPEs, we once again have 6 things operating in tandem at the same speed.

3 corresponds to the Wii U. Wii U has 3 cores, which cannot split into logical cores as the 360 CPU does. So only 3 things can execute simultaneously using this CPU. In addition, the speed at which things execute is nearly 1/3rd of the other two consoles (3.2 Ghz). So theoretically, Wii U is 5 times SLOWER than the 360 and PS3. The reasons it can push graphics almost equal to these consoles is:

- a stronger GPU (FAR superior to the others)
- less overhead (Though it can only push 14 GFLOPS compared to the 360's 115 and the PS3's 218, less processing power is spent on the numerous background tasks of more complex operating systems)
- more RAM, allowing more game data to occupy memory instead of being read from disk

I hope this has been educational for you.

User Info: sentoworf

sentoworf
4 years ago#2
I vote for Machamp
(@_@) Spinda is watching
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs2/1320435_o.gif

User Info: Megagunstarman

Megagunstarman
4 years ago#3
It's official.
I'm not changing this until a new Jet Set Radio is announced. Started 10/13/11

User Info: Nyyark

Nyyark
4 years ago#4
Sorry I only understand bad car tech metaphors, not bad mutant tech metaphors.

User Info: vidalmoraza

vidalmoraza
4 years ago#5
You forgot the age, newer CPUs are faster, even with lower or same clocks...

A Core 2 Duo 2.0Ghz CPU is faster than a Pentium Dual Core 2.0Ghz CPU, and they are both 2 cores and 2.0Ghz....

So it would be

1.- 60 years old
2.- 50 years old
3.- 20 years old
XBL/PSN/Steam/NNID: VidalukoVet
(most)This gen games: http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b245/VIdaluko/DSC00631.jpg

User Info: jmichaelbp

jmichaelbp
4 years ago#6
And yet ME3 runs better on the U than it does on the PS3.
"Ask not for whom the bell tolls... it tolls for thee." - In memory of Chuck, the wisest boxcar hobo of all time from Telltale's The Walking Dead.

User Info: HELZERO

HELZERO
4 years ago#7
3D, this is the Wii boards where logic doesn't have it's place. Inb4butWeHaveMario

And damnit I Iove your posts

User Info: SSJMario

SSJMario
4 years ago#8
This is stupid. Why am I responding to give it attention?
PSN=bowserkick

User Info: Mystic201

Mystic201
4 years ago#9
I prefer the 360 over the PS3.
Fallin Monkeys

User Info: crowkillers

crowkillers
4 years ago#10
How many bricks is each person carrying..?
"Be Reasonable, Demand the Impossible"
www.crowkillers.com
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. Why Wii U is weaker than the 360 and PS3, explained intuitively.

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived