The next Smash bros is probably going to suck. It will be for casuals.

#41sentoworfPosted 1/11/2013 3:23:11 AM
Why did they nerf Sheik ;_;
---
(@_@) Spinda is watching
http://gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs2/1320435_o.gif
#42Infectedglore2Posted 1/11/2013 3:25:17 AM
Reflex-Arc posted...
*Mashes buttons*

Yup, this is the same old Smash Bros. I remember.


As opposed to an average fighting game? At least just mashing buttons will get you instant killed by falling. I've seen 6 year olds beat hardcore players on UMVC3 by mashing the buttons.
TalentedM posted...
The game is made for the tiniest of children. Casual IS the crowd it is going for.


The GAMING INDUSTRY was meant for children.
#43The_Shadow_LinkPosted 1/11/2013 4:21:59 AM
Buretsu posted...
> Implying Smash Bros ever had depth
> Fox Only, No Items, Final Destination

lol


Mirror matchups alone have a fair bit of depth since the players are equally balanced in all possible ways. I could explain it but this video sums it up quite well enough for some like you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiEwmiPSmto
---
Wanting to become a wolf to end all of my life's problems.
People who agree with me: 37, Comment about it if you agree. ~*Ancient Status*~
#44MarioFanaticXVPosted 1/11/2013 4:36:24 AM
Buretsu posted...
> Implying Smash Bros ever had depth
> Fox Only, No Items, Final Destination

lol


It's not Smash's fault that people refused to play competitively and just wanted to turn it into a poorly-made Street Fighter clone.

Granted, tripping should be removed, some items should be banned, and Final Smashes were anything but balance, but overall, Melee and Brawl made some great strides toward being competitive.
---
"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:"
1 Tim 6:20
#45vyseskiesPosted 1/11/2013 4:41:56 AM
"The next Smash bros is probably going to suck. It will be for casuals."

No, it wont be for casuals, at least, as Namco had stated already. Search before doing such topics, knowledge is also important sometimes.
---
Hail Monster Hunter Franchise! Hail One Piece!
<3
#46SychinLegacyPosted 1/11/2013 6:35:19 AM
How did pikachu by become "more op"? They nerfed him so he can't thunder spam like he could in melee.

If anything the balance is much better in brawl because fox and falcon aren't insta win.
#47CaioNVPosted 1/11/2013 7:28:23 AM(edited)
Seriously, I play SSB Melee with items turned on, I don't play competitive, actually I'm near "casual crap" for sometimes putting items on very high and playing on Temple... And I dislike the third game.
Has Namco confirmed that they won't do the mess that HAL made with the third game?
---
Let's Blocking:
http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj88/Debug_Mode/sf3_2.png
#48TerotrousPosted 1/11/2013 8:06:51 AM
I don't see how you can casualize Smash much more than it already is TBQH. I actually think it's probably the best fighting game on the market, but it's certainly super accessible.
---
http://terosclassicgaming.blogspot.com/ - Watch me beat "NES Die Hard"
http://www.backloggery.com/tero - My backloggery
#49xLittlekillxPosted 1/11/2013 8:08:05 AM
I just hope it's as fun as Brawl was.
#50Xeeh_BitzPosted 1/11/2013 8:26:59 AM
I'm not understanding, Smash Bros was super casual from the start

"Baby's first Street Fighter"
---
To be fair, the bible has more plot holes than ME3. I wouldn't be listening either - Pies12