Why doesn't anyone ever want Sony to go third party?
Because Sony is a hardware company that also makes software.
Nintendo is a software company that also makes hardware.
Still waiting for Diddy Kong Racing 2
Why the Sony hate? They have great IP like sly, god of war, infamous, littlebigplanet, ratchet and clank, and more. Those saying Sony sucks are crazy.
Everyone subscribe to pure Nintendo magazine! It rocks!
DarkZV2Beta posted...Chocobo115 posted...DarkZV2Beta posted...Nintendo has IPs people care about. Genre definers that represent the very image of gaming.
Of course. Who would buy multiplats on consoles? Unless it's some online shooter that only a peasant would play anyway. Or a fighting game.
AMD CACHING = NOT YET FINISHED
a high end card gets bg3 1080p maxed around 200fps ~The Q on BF3.
The thought of a company that does a variety of things like TVs, game consoles, cameras, music players, and so on becoming a 3rd party game developer is a different beast than the thought of a strictly game company becoming a 3rd party game developer. Sony isn't just a gaming company, Nintendo is. So Nintendo going 3rd party makes far more sense.
Don't get me wrong, as a Nintendo fanboy, I don't want them to go 3rd party. But I recognize it would make more sense than Sony doing it.
As bad as Sony is at making money, they do make good hardware. From a gamers perspective we're better off with Sony hardware than Nintendo hardware. It may not be high end PC quality, but Sony hardware is better, it's good for third party games.
Why would anyone want them to? Sony makes amazing consoles.
Vayne Solidor of the DD012FF Board
Currently playing: Persona 4: Golden, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune
Not even a denial. And I even admitted some people call me one above, full disclaimer, unlike you pretending you're unbiased.
I was simply curious what right you had to call me biased when you're supposedly biased yourself. That was my "denial". People may call you an xbot, but no one, save for you, calls me a pony. You can even ask around the 360 board if you like.
You're one of the most hardcore ponies on GF, and extra salty that one b-tier Nintendo exclusive is better than Sony's entire first party output for an entire generation.
Is this drivel supposed to make any sense? Your poor attempt to paint me as the hardcore fanboy just make you look like a bigger one.
I'm not even sure why I'm even taking the time to reply to you right now. I typically hate replying to posts that boil down to "I'm a fanboy, but you're a bigger fanboy than me! So there!"
"You've lost this argument!"
--- John Marston while lassoing/hogtying someone. Favorite quote this gen.
MD1500 posted...Because Sony's first party games generally suck - as evidenced by their terrible sales.
Clearly you haven't spent that much time on this board yet.
Alundra is the best top-down Zelda game since Link to the Past.
Darksiders is the best 3D Zelda game since Ocarina of Time.
The Nintendo fanboys on this board seem positively obsessed with Sony.
"Maybe it would be quicker to list the Wii U multiplatform titles that AREN'T vastly inferior ports..." - SimeonSays
I don't have to "ask around" art, you're notorious on the 360 boards for your spin and damage control concerning anything even slightly Sony related, and ignoring the verbal vomit you're directing at me your own initial post in this very topic proves/demonstrates your dishonesty and bias far outweighs mine (not that that was even my point, but it's telling that you assumed that was my point).
The writing was on the wall with Bioware the minute you could completely void all of your decisions with one choice in KOTOR.