Walking Dead SI isn't awful

#11mjc0961Posted 3/16/2013 1:56:19 PM
Ambassador_Kong posted...
So, from my hour or so of playing, it's not the disaster many were predicting, but it isn't anything special either.The graphics and lack of game engine polish are a disappointment, but the combat is pretty fun and shooting zombies is quite satisfying.

Too early for a final score but I'm thinking somewhere between a C and a B-.


I dunno, from your description, it sounds about as bad as I was expecting. No polish whatsoever in another bog-standard FPS crossed with a bit of fetch quests.

Or in other words, it's the kind of rubbish I would play and say "this f***ing sucks."
---
sirtonne posted...
This topic is so stupid I had to slap my wife.
#12mjc0961Posted 3/16/2013 1:57:47 PM
Ambassador_Kong posted...
IGN gave the new Castlevania a 4.5 and I have a serious problem with that score. You give a 4.5 to a broken game and that game was far from broken


Ah, so you're one of those people... People who have no idea what numbers mean. 4.5 means slightly below average, not broken. 1s and 2s mean broken, and generally depend on how broken the game is for which score you get.
---
sirtonne posted...
This topic is so stupid I had to slap my wife.