Console games have shifted away from multiplayer, research finds

#1squatch22Posted 3/26/2013 2:31:06 AM
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/397887/console-games-have-shifted-away-from-multiplayer-research-finds/

Commentators often complain about a supposed abundance of tacked on multiplayer modes, but new research conducted by EEDAR has found that console game publishers have significantly shifted away from online support since the start of the current generation.

In a new report focused on multiplayer support in Xbox 360 and PS3 games released in the US, EEDAR chief operating officer Geoffrey Zatkin said (via Penny Arcade): "You can see that in 2006, one year into the release of the Xbox 360 and the launch year of the PlayStation 3, 67% of the games had online multiplayer, 58% had offline multiplayer and 28% had no multiplayer.

"By 2012, you can see that only 42% have online multiplayer, a drop of 25%, 44% have offline multiplayer, a drop of 14%, and 41% have no multiplayer, a rise of 16%. So, over time, fewer and fewer high definition console games are including multiplayer as part of their core offering."

The inclusion of multiplayer features is costly and is not guaranteed to improve sales unless it's a core part of the experience or executed to the highest of standards, Zatkin suggested.

"Multiplayer, when executed well, can be the heart of the game and is often what keeps people playing for extended periods of time," he said. "Best-in-class multiplayer, such Call of Duty, Halo, Madden, FIFA, League of Legends, World of Warcraft, etc. is awesome. A lot of the success of these games, both individual titles and franchises, is a result of their superior multiplayer execution.

"Including multiplayer for the sake of having multiplayer doesn't make sense," Zatkin reasoned, asking whether online support for the likes of BioShock Infinite, Batman Arkham City, Skyrim or Heavy Rain would have improved the experience.

On the drop in games supporting multiplayer features since the current console generation began, he added: "I don't think that players are noticing. I believe that people want good games. I don't think any single feature makes every game more fun; putting in a 'little bit of everything' often means that your game doesn't shine in any single area. A game that gives you a great experience is what you want; if the great experience involves multiplayer, fantastic. If it doesn't - well, that can be fantastic as well."
---
Nintendo: Leading the way for others to follow.
http://img.gamefaqs.net/screens/1/9/b/gfs_75574_2_16.jpg
#2TheBonfiniPosted 3/26/2013 2:42:49 AM
Agreed. If tacked on just leave it out.

Mosr Developers have given up trying to topple WOW and COD, for better or worse.
---
www.facebook.com/mikebonfini
Sapphic ladies - http://i.imgur.com/hU2rJ.jpg
#3Faceman_Posted 3/26/2013 2:55:44 AM
Good riddance. I'm so tired of horrible multiplayer just thrown in. Such as in Uncharted and Tomb Raider. God forbid you have to play a game by yourself.

The stupidest part being that all these online shooters, such as CoD, that have no local multiplayer. Why can't me and three friends play alone together in our house? It's a helluva lot more fun.
#4SolisPosted 3/26/2013 3:07:00 AM
Faceman_ posted...
The stupidest part being that all these online shooters, such as CoD, that have no local multiplayer. Why can't me and three friends play alone together in our house? It's a helluva lot more fun.


Uhh, what? The Call of Duty games have local multiplayer.
---
"Walking tanks must exist somewhere for there to be such attention to detail like this in mech sim." - IGN Steel Battalion review
#5the_tic_beginsPosted 3/26/2013 3:08:43 AM
Companies will still tack on multiplayer hoping to hitch a ride on cod gravy train.
Also where does this leave Nintendo? If no one cares for multi, don't bother with ssb or Mario kart???
---
Reviews are god. Except when they review something I like poorly. Then all reviews are paid or hating.
#6Schwepps01Posted 3/26/2013 3:15:22 AM
The stupidest part being that all these online shooters, such as CoD, that have no local multiplayer. Why can't me and three friends play alone together in our house? It's a helluva lot more fun.

Um... Have you ever picked up a CoD game in your life? Or are you just jumping on the hate bandwagon? How about you play the games before you say anything about them, just because they are high-selling and high-quality.
---
.
#7shaunmePosted 3/26/2013 3:24:48 AM
Typical, just as nintendo get their act together with an decent online service everybody else is moving on........decades behind.
---
i72600k @4.6 // ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution // 8gb ram // 3x MSI GTX 680 sli // 1tb HD//W8pro//NNID shaunme1//PSN poselecta//XBL CursiveA//STEAM shaunmelwell//
#8ChipChippersonPosted 3/26/2013 5:10:30 AM
Because anything other than CoD or Battlefield are ghost towns within days. Is there anybody out there actually playing multi in games like Mass Effect or Tomb Raider? Even if there are there are so few that it's not even worth the development costs.
---
As long as you're in my house, you'll do what I do, and believe what I believe. So butter your bacon... and bacon up that sausage, boy.
#9Baha05Posted 3/26/2013 5:27:01 AM
TheBonfini posted...
Agreed. If tacked on just leave it out.

Mosr Developers have given up trying to topple WOW and COD, for better or worse.


This I can enjoy decent to great MP but when they try and tack it on or have say a sub par MP mode then I feel that the game didn't warrant it or they needed to do a better job.
---
"I think there will be a price drop at the latest by E3. I'd even bet my account on it." Icecreamdunwich on the Wii U
#10thundercat2600Posted 3/26/2013 5:28:39 AM
shaunme posted...
Typical, just as nintendo get their act together with an decent online service everybody else is moving on........decades behind.


LOL yup pretty much. Nintendo has been 6 years behind since the N64 days.
---
they have the PC version of Darksiders 2 running on WiiU in 1080 native at 60 fps and full graphics options on. Neither 360 or PS3 can come close
-darkjedilink