I know the Wii U is weaker than the PS4/XBone in graphical power

#1Snow-DustPosted 8/11/2013 6:27:07 AM
But seriously, it may sound a whole lot more powerful on paper but when these things go on practical. They tend to just to be slightly better.

Besides to the graphic whores who go zoom-in times over 9000 to a screenshot to find a discoloured pixel or blurryness. The Wii U in graphics just pretty much looks similar to even the ones on the PS4/XBone.

Also one more thing, I prefer my game to look like wii games so they would release games faster than to have amazeballz HD but needing to wait 5+ years just for 1 game. Especially with cost efficiency where like FF13 bombed so hard and 14 bombed even harder because they thought gamers only play for graphics these days
#2legend253Posted 8/11/2013 6:28:20 AM
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
#3supermoc10Posted 8/11/2013 6:31:45 AM
FF13 and FF14 "bombed" cause they sucked.

On Topic: It's not gonna be a "slight" difference, far from it. There's nothing on Wii U that will ever look as good as Deep Down, The Division or The Witcher 3.

One thing I do like about Nintendo is that they favor 60 FPS for their games which is cool.
---
PSN & Xbox Live: supermoc10
"Mr Zurkon does NOT come in peace"
#4P_A_N_D_A_M_A_NPosted 8/11/2013 6:37:43 AM
The difference between Wii U and PS4 this gen will be nowhere near that of Wii to PS3 as some would claim. I'd say the difference is closer to Gen6 with PS2 to Xbox.
---
NNID: Ko-san
"SUUUPERRR!"
#5cybersonic233Posted 8/11/2013 6:38:32 AM
Graphics sadly will matter most this gen games will be an after thought
#6John_MagnumPosted 8/11/2013 6:39:52 AM
FF13 didn't bomb at all.
#7pearl arowanaPosted 8/11/2013 6:43:08 AM
after 9 months.. all wii u games we see so far = ps3 graphic.. that pertty much sum it up..
---
Drones Topic Derailing guidelines ..(rofl)
1) insult nick name 2) insult user level 3) Insult English and grammar
#8P_A_N_D_A_M_A_NPosted 8/11/2013 6:43:46 AM
cybersonic233 posted...
Graphics sadly will matter most this gen games will be an after thought


Hopefully not. They never have, and I hope devs start seeing that good graphics =\= good game.
---
NNID: Ko-san
"SUUUPERRR!"
#9P_A_N_D_A_M_A_NPosted 8/11/2013 6:53:27 AM(edited)
pearl arowana posted...
after 9 months.. all wii u games we see so far = ps3 graphic.. that pertty much sum it up..


X

Oh, and if you think this is the Wii U's limit, then you are sorely mistaken. Unless, of course, you think the PS3 never got better than this


http://86bb71d19d3bcb79effc-d9e6924a0395cb1b5b9f03b7640d26eb.r91.cf1.rackcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/resistance-fall-of-man-ps3-screenshot-big.jpg


---
NNID: Ko-san
"SUUUPERRR!"
#10Snow-Dust(Topic Creator)Posted 8/11/2013 6:45:32 AM
supermoc10 posted...
FF13 and FF14 "bombed" cause they sucked.

On Topic: It's not gonna be a "slight" difference, far from it. There's nothing on Wii U that will ever look as good as Deep Down, The Division or The Witcher 3.

One thing I do like about Nintendo is that they favor 60 FPS for their games which is cool.


My point about FF13 and 14 is that they focus on graphics over practically everything else and so they have that abomination. If they spent less time on graphics and more time on fine tuning the the very high potential battle system and a more open world map instead a very clear linear road. It probably would've came off better

Also, the game you listed, In my opinion only looks slightly matchable to X on wii u