isn't 9.8 a bit too high a score for Wind waker HD?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. isn't 9.8 a bit too high a score for Wind waker HD?

User Info: TechniMyoko

TechniMyoko
3 years ago#41
9.8 was too high of a score for 10 years ago, now it's just a joke.

User Info: nonexistinghero

nonexistinghero
3 years ago#42
kukingina2 posted...
LaManoNeraII posted...
WW's design and art direction was exceptional. HD version only corrects the few flaws of the original and remasters the visuals perfectly. Its the definitive version of one of the best games of gen 6. Why would it deserve lesser praise?



because 11 year old content is 11 year old content.


It doesn't make the game 11 years worse. If anything, it just speaks volumes about how resistant Nintendo games are against aging, to be able to still compete with the best of the best modern games.
Read the mania: http://www.fanfiction.net/~nonexistinghero
In SA2, it's Super Sonic and Hyper Shadow.

User Info: mlahodik

mlahodik
3 years ago#43
albanianx1 posted...
Seems way too high. No remastered/redone games should hit close to perfect IMO but to each his own. I guess I'm just not going to take any of his reviews seriously from now on, seems like a new guy at IGN.


Games are not reviewed considering time. They are reviewed for quality. A game should get whatever score they get regardless of when it was originally released.

Think of this, a player who hasn't played WW or any other re-take for that matter, should be able to look at a review of the game and get an accurate description of the quality of the game.

If the game is a 10 for example, why should it be penalized by having points taken away just because it was released previously? WWHD improves on the original, so it should get a better score.
FC: 4081-6350-3674 ; NNID: Mahrii
If you believe in Jesus Christ, have accepted Him as your Lord and Savior, and are 100% proud of it, put this in your sig.

User Info: jbilly12

jbilly12
3 years ago#44
who cares what some person rated it

User Info: fuzi11

fuzi11
3 years ago#45
gametrailers gave it 7.8 because it is just a hd remake and should offer more

User Info: pyrotempestwing

pyrotempestwing
3 years ago#46
Wait, people actually care about reviews and decide if they like it then and there instead of actually trying the game for themselves?
FC's: B1: Lexi 2365-9525-1918; B2: Misaki 4213-1809-7119 3DS FC: Thomas 5069-4431-9392
Yeah, I'm a crossplayer. Deal with it.

User Info: j_darrell

j_darrell
3 years ago#47
Nintendo owners love remakes, can't be too surprised. I liked the Ocarina 3DS.

User Info: MarioFanaticXV

MarioFanaticXV
3 years ago#48
If it's the same game, it should get the same score.
"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:"
1 Tim 6:20

User Info: Banjo2553

Banjo2553
3 years ago#49
Maybe the changes, when put together, really add up to make for a much more enjoyable experience? That's what Andre said with his GameXplain review--the changes seem small and not really important but put together they really add up.
Come see my game collection: http://www.backloggery.com/bakonbitz
  1. Boards
  2. Wii U
  3. isn't 9.8 a bit too high a score for Wind waker HD?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived