C/D: Mario Games are the epitome of Casual Games

#21NovaLevossidaPosted 10/29/2013 2:11:58 AM
Alex, what is Angry Birds?
---
-C- GET EQUIPPED WITH: [ ] KLOBB [ ] BFG
[ ] METAL BLADE [X] CUTSCENE MURDER PISTOL
#22fuzi11Posted 10/29/2013 2:29:49 AM
D: Angry Birds, Candy Crush,..
#23segagamerPosted 10/29/2013 2:46:59 AM
Both
---
Wii U+Xbox One :)
#24Number_0nePosted 10/29/2013 3:01:14 AM
D. While most Mario games are casual, there are still many other games that would be more accurate for the epitome of causal. For example, Angry Birds or EA Sports games.
---
You can't spell slaughter without laughter!
#25Rpg AddictPosted 10/29/2013 3:43:03 AM
Deny. I agree with the people who are saying that they represent gaming as a whole: they can be played a variety of ways, by anyone. A lot of people with an interest can play through most of the 2D games pretty well, and for people who are more "hardcore" fans and can play well, there are a variety of other challenges or ways to play. There's something for everyone.
---
Space for rent.
#26Pharsti01Posted 10/29/2013 3:56:39 AM
Nop, smartphone games take that easily.
---
Democracy is when 2 wolves and a sheep meet to decide who is for dinner.
Liberty is when the sheep has a gun.
#27FishbulbPosted 10/29/2013 3:58:40 AM
Deny.

Angry Birds is the epitome of casual.
---
Broadcasting your religious faith in a sig is obnoxious. All who agree copy/paste this sig.
#28mashuPosted 10/29/2013 5:22:16 AM
D.

Throwaway smartphone time wasters you play for 5 minutes here or there while standing in line are the epitome of casual games. That pretty much defines them.

Mario and platformers in general have always been sort of casual games, but not using the definition that casual games are defined by now. They're for everyone, but do take a little skill. They helped to define platformers as a genre.
#29Rasputin77Posted 10/29/2013 6:09:37 AM
Absolutely deny.

amonte64 posted...
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]

LOL, dude, someone on this board has a severe boy-crush on you! Let me guess... it was the "dust" comment, which didn't violate any TOS, other than "making an already-paper-thin skinned poster want to respond inappropriately".
---
The irony of GameFAQs -- http://postimg.org/image/a2yrtprql/
The "coddled generation" bit of the week: http://alturl.com/q5ev6