Far Cry 2 was almost the perfect shooter, why change it so drastically?

  • Topic Archived
You're browsing the GameFAQs Message Boards as a guest. Sign Up for free (or Log In if you already have an account) to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts.
  1. Boards
  2. Far Cry 3
  3. Far Cry 2 was almost the perfect shooter, why change it so drastically?

User Info: holstershaker

holstershaker
4 years ago#31
the trailer gives me so much hope. i think it looks so promising.

User Info: Perfect Light

Perfect Light
4 years ago#32
Because Far Cry 2 was tedious and boring in a lot of people's eyes. I never finished it myself because dealing with the stupid map, the constantly respawning outposts and psychic enemies got really old really fast.
youtube.com/sciencebytes...learn something new

User Info: Famine_10f4

Famine_10f4
4 years ago#33

I love Africa but, in my opinion, they really drooped the ball.

Where were all the animals?! I mean sure you had your occasional zebra and gazelle but for the most part it was dead... They could have had elephants, giraffes, hippos, lions, etc...

I know they said they didn't include predatorial animals because they would hunt you, which is complete BS! They could have programmed them easily enough NOT to hunt you, or only attack when you get too close to them. This is a game after all.

The story was completely lack luster, and the dialog felt SOOO flat it made me want to skip all the story segments.

So far I'm liking FarCry 3, I hope it will be everything we want it to be.

  1. Boards
  2. Far Cry 3
  3. Far Cry 2 was almost the perfect shooter, why change it so drastically?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived