If I really liked this game, should I check out Just Cause 2?

#11Piccolo_SanPosted 11/28/2013 10:14:28 PM
Just cause 2 is a good diversion. The story and the missions are horrible imo and the only fun you'll get out of it is the random chaos.
---
"Once, my tv didn't work, so I kicked it. And it started working again. 8)" - Deadpool
#12LoveunitPosted 12/27/2013 6:00:26 AM
Don't

They're very different games, and if you expect FC3 going into JC2 you'll be disappointed because there is nothing they have in common... well, aside from the setting of the place.
Personally, I hate JC2, didn't even get through the early missions. The controls were too clunky for me to enjoy. There are others who absolutely love it, so it's not necessarily a bad game.
#13Zellio2014Posted 12/29/2013 3:16:21 PM
Jc2 is a highly unrealistic sandbox game. I had many fun hours attaching trucks to airplanes for instance..
#14MrskagglesPosted 1/9/2014 9:33:58 AM
JC2>FC3
#15nuschler2212Posted 2/7/2014 3:34:54 AM
This game feels like a mix between JC2 and RDR to me. I liked both so good for me I guess.

But as to your question JC2 was pretty unrated and had a lot if replay value. If you like the element of capturing the enemy forts than you'll probably like JC2 because you can spend hours just going around and doing that.

Although sometimes it gets annoying in JC2 because capturing the bases goes by the percentage of blowing up certain items. When you hit 100 it converts. And sometimes you'll be stuck for a while at 96% (for example) and can't figure out what hasn't been destroyed.
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.
#16nuschler2212Posted 2/7/2014 3:35:24 AM
Underrated. Not unrated. :)
---
I put my pants on just like the rest of you, one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I write brilliant posts.