Ranking System

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Ranking System

User Info: That1Guyy

That1Guyy
4 years ago#21
Killean_Nuggets posted...
Did you play arena when it was first released? They had it so it was based on "personal performance". Arena is still awful, but it has improved drastically.


Are you aware that Arena isn't the only performance based implementation? Halo 2 used performance based metrics, not win based. And, excluding the rampant number of cheaters due to LIVE's easy exploitability, Halo 2 had a better ranking system.
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.

User Info: Killean_Nuggets

Killean_Nuggets
4 years ago#22
Winning > personal performance
vBlite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw5x_bc9Lvo&feature=plcp

User Info: InYourWalls1

InYourWalls1
4 years ago#23
Nostromo1685 posted...
This. This so much. I remember how frustrating Halo 2 and 3 got once you got to a high level.

I'm all for companies listening to fan concerns but sometimes people cry over the dumbest things.


lol

typical buttfrustrated casual hating on others cause he sucks so much
GT: X F4ktoR

User Info: That1Guyy

That1Guyy
4 years ago#24
Killean_Nuggets posted...
Winning > personal performance


K.
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.

User Info: iRGush

iRGush
4 years ago#25
They just need to redo an elo system where winning is basically the only factor and getting a 50 will actually incredibly hard.
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
GT: iRGush

User Info: TPZmikez

TPZmikez
4 years ago#26
From: That1Guyy | #021
Killean_Nuggets posted...
Did you play arena when it was first released? They had it so it was based on "personal performance". Arena is still awful, but it has improved drastically.


Are you aware that Arena isn't the only performance based implementation? Halo 2 used performance based metrics, not win based. And, excluding the rampant number of cheaters due to LIVE's easy exploitability, Halo 2 had a better ranking system.


This.
You down with O.P.P?
People that answered correctly: 37

User Info: Nostromo1685

Nostromo1685
4 years ago#27
Oh please, apples to oranges.

If you're good at the game, stats should be able to tell the whole world how leet you are.

Because yeah, 343i really screwed you on your purchase.

The game isn't a game and isn't complete if I can't have a number next to my name that measures the size of my E Member.


And I thought December 21, 2012 was the end of the world. I guess I was wrong.

User Info: InYourWalls1

InYourWalls1
4 years ago#28
That1Guyy posted...
Killean_Nuggets posted...
Did you play arena when it was first released? They had it so it was based on "personal performance". Arena is still awful, but it has improved drastically.


Are you aware that Arena isn't the only performance based implementation? Halo 2 used performance based metrics, not win based.


Didn't Halo 2 take both into account?
GT: X F4ktoR

User Info: Dipfoot20

Dipfoot20
4 years ago#29
From: Killean_Nuggets | #020
I should be thankful for a game that I spend money on, not containing what I want............


If it doesn't contain what you want....don't buy it.
I can't wait for Jones to GnP Silva into oblivion http://i.imgur.com/qiTqR.gif
Actually, disregard that, Jones would get brutally embarrassed by the Spider.

User Info: That1Guyy

That1Guyy
4 years ago#30
InYourWalls1 posted...
Didn't Halo 2 take both into account?


I would love to get the exact information on the ranking system, but the Bungie link is dead.
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Ranking System

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived