Dear Halo Reach Critics...

#11CrayonmuffinPosted 11/9/2012 4:55:15 AM
The only thing I didn't like about it was the initial maps it was released with. The maps after that were just fine. Loved the campaign. Other than CE, it's my favorite Halo to date. Haven't finished 4 yet so I can't comment on it yet.
#12mr_blobby213Posted 11/9/2012 5:03:29 AM
For me, Reach was the best Halo since CE.
---
Gamefaqs discriminates against the poor.
#13SerenityIVPosted 11/9/2012 5:06:18 AM
Reach is my favorite game in the series so far. Keep in mind, I haven't played H4 yet, but I thought Reach was a great game. I don't fully understand the complaints either. After reading some in this topic so far, I can see people's frustration, but they didn't bother me so much. Issues like that just weren't a concern. I would have liked the game be a little more general, meaning more huge firefights and epic scenes, but I loved it. Best since H1.
---
Is it that I'm not supposed to exist? - Xion
#14sonicteam2k1Posted 11/9/2012 5:12:43 AM
it wasn't an awful game. technically it's a solid game but I hated the multi player. the maps were very bad and I didn't like how you voted on maps but each map had a different match type.

this is all remedied in Halo 4. Now lets hope we see some more quality maps.
---
See The Game Collection
http://www.gamespot.com/users/nights_team2k7/games_table?mode=own
#15PooTPosted 11/9/2012 5:13:18 AM
Ok.
#16The BeansterPosted 11/9/2012 5:30:55 AM(edited)
KurtHectic posted...
1) WHY was Reach so bad? I played it up until Halo 4 came out, and I really have no major complaints. For Bungie's last go at Halo, I felt they did a good job.

2) Are they mainly just opinion based, or are there any legitimate reasons as to why Reach "sucked"? Note I am talking about the whole game, not just campaign or matchmaking.

I'm looking for constructive criticisms, thanks. Trolls will be ignored. :)

Bonus question: What exactly qualifies as a "bad" Halo game? I have played all of them and I think each installment is good in its own unique way (minus Halo Wars, never played that one so I can't offer any input)


1) Campaign:
- Characters were one dimensional and uninteresting (IMO the biggest problem) and the story didn't get much meaning behind it until the end of the game when you reach the "escort Cortana" phase
- Overall story/mood seemed to retcon a lot of what was established in the book Fall of Reach

But those could have been overlooked if it weren't for multiplayer. MP in reach was AWFUL for this series:
2) Multiplayer:
- Bloom, especially with how it was initially implemented, was a horrid mechanic that introduced too much randomness to gun battles.

- Armor Abilities were not balanced/integrated well for 4v4 play. They made the gameplay flow much more clunky than in previous Halo games

- The maps were horrid. Utterly terrible. There's a reason that the vast majority of maps, especially in a list like team slayer, are now forge maps, resulting in what is surely the grayest looking game of all time.

- Whatever trueskill system they had was implemented unbelievably badly. I don't know that I ever had a match where all players were of similar skill. It was worse than Halo 2 or Halo 3's social matchmaking.

The end result was a multiplayer game that was boring and only fun for goofing around in non-competitive gametypes (e.g. Big Team). There's no such thing, really, as competitive play in Reach. Even MLG is basically focused around turning Reach into Halo 3 v2. I can't even remember the last time I had any interest in playing 4v4 Team Slayer in Reach.

Reach is basically IMO what counts as a bad Halo game - throw in a campaign with no interesting story points and no interesting characters + a multiplayer that's boring, clunky, and broken compared to Halo 1/2/3, and you've got yourself a bad Halo game.
---
i7-2600k @ 4.8 Ghz | 2x MSI 7970 Lightning @ 1200/1800 | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM
Currently Playing: Halo 4, Sleeping Dogs || GT: The Ownage
#17botanicbubblesPosted 11/9/2012 6:02:49 AM(edited)
Never got into the competitive multiplayer, but I thoroughly enjoyed firefight and loved the campaign. The worst part about the game IMO was the motion blur/ghosting bungie used. That **** looks awful.
---
GT/PSN- botanicbubbles
http://perilsofrepose.webs.com/
#18The BeansterPosted 11/9/2012 5:42:57 AM
botanicbubbles posted...
Never got into the competitive multiplayer, but I thoroughly enjoyed firefight and loved the campaign. The worst part about the game IMO was the motion blur/ghosting bungie put used. That **** looks awful.


It's a side affect of the anti-aliasing technique that they chose to implement, and yeah it looks HORRIBLE. I can't believe that no review mentioned it, because it's nauseating particularly in cutscenes.
---
i7-2600k @ 4.8 Ghz | 2x MSI 7970 Lightning @ 1200/1800 | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM
Currently Playing: Halo 4, Sleeping Dogs || GT: The Ownage
#19motoraptorPosted 11/9/2012 5:49:50 AM
Armor Lock
Jetpack
Grenades
90% of all maps being Forge maps with the same Forge icon with the same grey buildings with the same green grass

BORING.
#20kukingina2Posted 11/9/2012 6:59:27 AM
bro do you even lift?
---
http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Robertzombie-1277/hero/4774941
So Is Metroid's gun a part of his armor or is he a cyborg like Data from Star Wars?