Name one thing that Reach did better...

#1TuSoKa67Posted 11/10/2012 2:22:00 PM
Don't get me wrong, I believe this game is way better then Reach. Halo 4 is just missing some things that Reach did right.

-When looking at another persons party details, the type of game they are playing and the time left is not shown.

I know there's plenty to mention but just name one.
Gamertag: T u S o K a
#2That1GuyyPosted 11/10/2012 2:22:50 PM
The entire menu interface. Halo 4 has a lot of wasted space and arbitrary extra button pushes in its menus.
Perfection. Where everyone fails.
If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.
#3PenguinKoalaPosted 11/10/2012 2:23:02 PM

The way the sniper sounds

That's all for me tbh.
"I played through normal on D2, which was enough to tell me it wasn't as fun as Titan Quest or PSO." ~ Sinfullyvannila
#4Wookie_Is_BackPosted 11/10/2012 2:23:34 PM
Absolutely nothing. Reach isn't even a Halo game.
#5SR71haloPosted 11/10/2012 2:24:27 PM
Forgeworld is the biggest thing I miss.
Now Leave!
#6myoldnamePosted 11/10/2012 2:24:39 PM
Gun noises. I hate how to Storm Rifle sounds like a suppressed human weapon.
#7Turtlemayor333Posted 11/10/2012 2:25:20 PM
Reach had awful menus. Not excusing this game, but they could have gone back to Halo 2 menus and it would have been fine.
#8zeroboboPosted 11/10/2012 2:26:00 PM
co-op campaign. allowed the players to each look different.
it was weird having 2 master chiefs.
#9zeppo_basicPosted 11/10/2012 2:28:32 PM
Reach had more map variations and way more options for matchmaking, where the hell is multi-team?! But at the same time I figure they will add most of these features on later just as they did with Reach, where 343 constantly updated servers and matchmaking features.
#10iRGushPosted 11/10/2012 2:28:38 PM
The UI.
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
GT: iRGush