Don't get me wrong, I believe this game is way better then Reach. Halo 4 is just missing some things that Reach did right.
-When looking at another persons party details, the type of game they are playing and the time left is not shown.
I know there's plenty to mention but just name one. --- Gamertag: T u S o K a
#2That1GuyyPosted 11/10/2012 2:22:50 PM
The entire menu interface. Halo 4 has a lot of wasted space and arbitrary extra button pushes in its menus. --- Perfection. Where everyone fails. If you expect nothing you can be happy for everything.
#3PenguinKoalaPosted 11/10/2012 2:23:02 PM
The way the sniper sounds
That's all for me tbh. --- "I played through normal on D2, which was enough to tell me it wasn't as fun as Titan Quest or PSO." ~ Sinfullyvannila
#4Wookie_Is_BackPosted 11/10/2012 2:23:34 PM
Absolutely nothing. Reach isn't even a Halo game.
#5SR71haloPosted 11/10/2012 2:24:27 PM
Forgeworld is the biggest thing I miss. --- Now Leave!
#6myoldnamePosted 11/10/2012 2:24:39 PM
Gun noises. I hate how to Storm Rifle sounds like a suppressed human weapon.
#7Turtlemayor333Posted 11/10/2012 2:25:20 PM
Reach had awful menus. Not excusing this game, but they could have gone back to Halo 2 menus and it would have been fine. --- http://i.imgur.com/WWk7D.jpg http://i.imgur.com/YSuCm.jpg http://i.imgur.com/WYbKi.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ZGFPz.jpg
#8zeroboboPosted 11/10/2012 2:26:00 PM
co-op campaign. allowed the players to each look different. it was weird having 2 master chiefs.
#9zeppo_basicPosted 11/10/2012 2:28:32 PM
Reach had more map variations and way more options for matchmaking, where the hell is multi-team?! But at the same time I figure they will add most of these features on later just as they did with Reach, where 343 constantly updated servers and matchmaking features. --- MapleHoodOG
#10iRGushPosted 11/10/2012 2:28:38 PM
The UI. --- Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. GT: iRGush