4 > 2 = 3 > CE > Reach.

#71haloiscoolisbakPosted 11/22/2012 6:20:54 PM
Even Bungie will tell you CE was their best campaign. I mean come on now.
---
:|
#72WebsandWigsPosted 11/22/2012 6:33:27 PM
haloiscoolisbak posted...
Even Bungie will tell you CE was their best campaign. I mean come on now.


Seriously, some people here are so desperate to have a unique opinion they're just throwing reason out the window.
#73The BeansterPosted 11/23/2012 7:33:12 AM(edited)
Duwstai posted...
From: The Beanster | #009
ShockWav3 posted...
Although I feel like both would be above this, but Halo 2 only gets such a good spot for BxR, double shot, and quick reloads. Without those glitches I would rank it way lower.


You just named several of the things that made H2 worse than H3.



What an absolutely terrible opinion. Let me guess, you sucked at Halo 2?


Nope. Mid 30s in several lists. BxR was a glitch that should have been fixed, same as superbouncing and cross map sword lunging (which did actually get fixed).

And yes I could do the glitches. However, some people like yourself seem to think that glitches = skill, and that's not the case. Glitches = broken, by definition.

Sword was a true power weapon... you shouldn't need a glitch to deal with it, you just needed teamwork/stickies/shotgun.

Glitches + tons of online cheaters = not a great matchmaking game compared to Halo 3. Like I said, it's a better LAN tournament game because it's hitscan and has a better BR, but Halo 3 is the better online matchmaking game.

Let me guess, you sucked at Halo 3?
---
i7-2600k @ 4.8 Ghz | 2x MSI 7970 Lightning @ 1200/1800 | 8 GB DDR3-1600 RAM
Currently Playing: Halo 4, Sleeping Dogs || GT: The Ownage
#74pblimp360Posted 11/23/2012 8:23:47 AM
^ I agree with, Beanster here. 3 was just better balanced in most every way, and had a better matchmaking system. The cheapness of players online in Halo 2 took away from it imho. Too many glitches and those willing to exploit them.
---
#Halo 4
#75__balePosted 11/23/2012 8:31:09 AM
CE > Reach > 4 > 2 > 3
#76GeomagnusPosted 11/23/2012 8:38:37 AM
Out of the ones I've played:

4>3>REACH>ODST>2
#77faxmachnePosted 11/23/2012 8:39:21 AM
3>4>Reach>ODST>CE>2>WARS

I love them all but this is my experience

keep in mind that i never played 2 online, but the story was nothing on the others

reach had a great story as did odst

4 has may fave multiplayer, 3 the best story

4 was a good story until the end, which was poor

WARS was bad
---
Thanks to the guy who blabbed on my old one
#78ViktorMaxPosted 11/23/2012 9:22:28 AM
2 > Reach TU > 3 > 4 > CE > Reach
---
True dat.
#79MelfiicePosted 11/23/2012 9:31:49 AM
My opinion is 2>Reach>4>3...2 is probably more nostalgia for me though, so its really reach and this game that are up there for me. I really hated the maps in 3 for some reason.
#80ViktorMaxPosted 11/23/2012 9:38:48 AM(edited)
I think H4 has the worst release day maps. Every map is horrible except for Haven and maybe Solace (which is still kinda meh...). Too many ways to get to each place on the map. Map control is joke in this game.

At least Reach had Zealot, Countdown and Asylum (Sanc basically). Those were a nice core of 3 maps. H4 has no core... only has Haven.
---
True dat.