Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?

#11WingZero0782Posted 11/23/2012 10:50:12 AM
Better, Reach's story was unnecessary (the one in the game), I'm not getting into why I said that as I've brought it up too many times on here.
---
Currently Playing: who the **** cares.
DCUO Name: Techno Knight, Level: 30, Server: Crossfire, League: TheGothamKnights.
#12wg64ZPosted 11/23/2012 10:52:33 AM
These are as opposed to Reach

Cons:
Grenade Indicator
JIP
No weapons on map
Instant Respawn = No teabagging, a Halo staple for years
Promethian Vision
Menus are terrible
Boltshot
Higher leveled people have better equipment
No Rumble pit
Unlocking Emblems
No Halo theme in game, ever
Hammer got nerfed massively
You can't pickup grenades without wasting a perk slot
Joining a game as a party can and will split you up
Unavoidable, and inaccurate kill cams
No Revenant or Falcon
Maps aren't nearly as good/plentiful

Pros:
No Armor lock
Hologram is useful
Everyone can sprint
Graphics are purdy
Sound effects are amazing
Spartan Ops

I wish I could think of more Pros...
#13Majoras_pantsPosted 11/23/2012 10:57:14 AM
It's much better.Reach was good but Halo 4 is an improvement in every way, besides the crappy ordinances.
#14MelfiicePosted 11/23/2012 11:06:45 AM
I liked Reach better. Im hoping in time, this game will grow more on me.
#15NightRainPosted 11/23/2012 11:11:06 AM
IMO, Reach was kinda better...
---
Xbox 360/Wii
Canadiens/Red Sox/Patriots
#16foodeater4Posted 11/23/2012 11:21:28 AM
Reach was my current favorite besides the original Halo.

The campaigns both are good.

I like Master Chief/Cortanna a ton and its good to see whats happening to them next after H3.

Reach was great too, I know its not much but I love being able to pick gender and select all my own armor. The campaign was very good.

Mulitplayer I definatly like H4 better then Reach. The games are a bit faster, I love the ordinance drops. Cons: Maps: only 4 maps for your standard slayer game types, thats really poor IMO. There should be at least 6-8 maps outta the box for the most popular game type.

I also like spartan ops a lot, much better then another horde IMO, especially since Gears outclasses every other games horde modes.
#17Raddy8Posted 11/23/2012 11:24:40 AM
Campaign was better in Reach imo. MC is cool and all, but I enjoyed being Noble 6. Enemy designs were a bit better in Reach also I think.
Firefight was replaced by Spartan Ops. Pretty similar actually, just a bit of story to Ops though.
MP I am enjoying more in 4 overall. I miss some modes like Invasion, but MP is really fun imo.
---
Gamertag: Pickle Swift
3DS friend code: 4339-2579-4895
#18Protoman_X38Posted 11/23/2012 11:29:12 AM(edited)
Halo Reach had a far better campaign. The story isn't too bad in H4, but the levels are just not as much fun.

There are a lot of features from Reach that are completely absent in H4.
---
567i3e7oe7klw5seksw5kjw5ejejetyjkretketkje5ykekeke,le6ulke3klke6ululeul
http://i.minus.com/ibyp8mPjN.gif
#19oblivionscythePosted 11/23/2012 11:44:51 AM(edited)
With 2 being my favorite & Reach being my least.. This is far better than Reach. But as always, opinions are opinions.

---
Sent from my iPhone via PowerFAQs 1.9
#20RayzerTagPosted 11/23/2012 11:59:54 AM(edited)
EDIT: double post