Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?
3 years ago#21
The singleplayer is about the same. Halo 4 has much better characters than Reach's bland soldier parade, and it's story is fortunately much less down to earth. Where in Reach's campaign everyone could have been swapped with generic soldiers, this game's vide is truly alien. The graphics are astonishing help convey this theme. However, there are not as much vehicle sections as in 3 (about as much as Reach) and the new enemies aren't as fun to fight as Covenant.

The multiplayer is a collosal step forward from Reach. There are a lot of small flaws, but overall 343 really NAILED the map design and weapon balance, making this one of the most enjoyable competitive multiplayers this generation.

I would give it an 8/10, compared to 3's and Reach's 9/10 and 6/10 respectively.

EDIT: wait, is this a joke topic?
3 years ago#22
Far worse, its call of halo now, this is not Halo.
3 years ago#23
Worse because no Halo game ever can compare to the fun times/enjoyment I got out of Halo: Reach. Halo: Reach was Bungie's perfected masterpiece game.
3 years ago#24
Far better than Reach.
Xbox Live Gamertag: Brendover
PSN: BabyInABrender
3 years ago#25
Single Player- Worse
Multiplayer- Better
3 years ago#26
Reach > Halo 4 in multiplayer
3 years ago#27
Yeah Reach was much better all around I'd say.
3 years ago#28
A lot better.
3 years ago#29
A poll woulda been great. Worse IMO
(message deleted)
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Is this better or worse than Halo: Reach?

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived