Halo sucks because of CoD (for most people)

  • Topic Archived
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Halo sucks because of CoD (for most people)
3 years ago#1
/opinion

The truth is Cod has made it hard for Halo to get rollin again. Not just because of CoD massive popularity, but because Halo is now a much more "skill" based game than CoD. Any person who has played CoD can sum it up in a few ways. But basically, you run around until you see someone then whoever shoots first (or has the better connection) wins OR you find a spot to hide and shoot anyone that moves, only slightly changing your hiding spot every now and then. Halo was once a simple game, but since CoD is much simpler, Halo now seems like to much of a chore to actually aim at someone's head, strafe to avoid shots fired, crouch to avoid radar, crouch jumping for shortcuts, taking cover to regen shields and actually go in for the kill in most situations instead of hiding until you camped out a kill streak. So yea, I want to say for most CoD fans and of course PS3 fanboys, Halo does suck.


/endopinion
---
LoL: Stank Dangerous
3 years ago#2
ITT: Humanity has gotten lazy.
---
Official Rinnosuke Morichika of the Dissidia 012: Duodecim Final Fantasy Board
PSN + Gamertag: CrimsonKnightSH
3 years ago#3
ShadowH2006 posted...
ITT: Humanity has gotten lazy.

---
Meow Said the Raptor
GT: KittyKitty13
3 years ago#4
I don't find either CoD's near instant kills or Halo's hitscan to require more skill. The only thing Halo has going for it is a marginally longer time to kill and the ability to attempt to evade fire. But, again, hitscan.
---
Invading world of the guilty as spirit of vengeance The guilty pay the price.
I hate Square-Activision's FFXIII and its slew of cash-in spin-offs & sequels
3 years ago#5
Raptorkitty posted...
ShadowH2006 posted...
ITT: Humanity has gotten lazy.

---
Xbox 360 GT: I KiD ViCiOuS I
PSVITA: CoMpLeX_EniGMa
3 years ago#6
Halo does indeed require more work meaning you get that satisfaction of getting the kill delayed. Cod is so quick and you will get a rush so fast from stacking up lots of kills.

Halo is slower paced but not a slow game, yet it does require much more attention to stay alive and to get a kill more often than CoD does.

All in all I feel the simplicity of CoD kill/respawn mechanics vs Halo is what makes CoD subjectively the more enjoyable experience.
---
LoL: Stank Dangerous
3 years ago#7
NovaLevossida posted...
I don't find either CoD's near instant kills or Halo's hitscan to require more skill. The only thing Halo has going for it is a marginally longer time to kill and the ability to attempt to evade fire. But, again, hitscan.


You do know that one a few of the weapons are hitscan, right? BR is, DMR isn't.
---
You are the child of my makers. Inheritor of all they left behind. You are Forerunner! But this ring... is mine.
3 years ago#8
VoidBeyond posted...
NovaLevossida posted...
I don't find either CoD's near instant kills or Halo's hitscan to require more skill. The only thing Halo has going for it is a marginally longer time to kill and the ability to attempt to evade fire. But, again, hitscan.


You do know that one a few of the weapons are hitscan, right? BR is, DMR isn't.


You do know that there's no reason to choose the BR over the DMR in ranges where hitscan matters, and that the DMR performs well enough in ranges where the BR performs well, right?

At any rate, my point is about shooting mechanics, and the presence of a hitscan long range weapon negates any argument that we might have for shooting mechanics taking skill. The game itself has skill built into its mechanics, but it's not because of hitscan's ability to hit whatever your reticule is over.
---
Invading world of the guilty as spirit of vengeance The guilty pay the price.
I hate Square-Activision's FFXIII and its slew of cash-in spin-offs & sequels
3 years ago#9
NovaLevossida posted...
VoidBeyond posted...
NovaLevossida posted...
I don't find either CoD's near instant kills or Halo's hitscan to require more skill. The only thing Halo has going for it is a marginally longer time to kill and the ability to attempt to evade fire. But, again, hitscan.


You do know that one a few of the weapons are hitscan, right? BR is, DMR isn't.


You do know that there's no reason to choose the BR over the DMR in ranges where hitscan matters, and that the DMR performs well enough in ranges where the BR performs well, right?


Irrelevant, you implied that all the weapons were hitscan. I said they're not and used BR/DMR as an example =)
---
You are the child of my makers. Inheritor of all they left behind. You are Forerunner! But this ring... is mine.
3 years ago#10
VoidBeyond posted...
NovaLevossida posted...
VoidBeyond posted...
NovaLevossida posted...
I don't find either CoD's near instant kills or Halo's hitscan to require more skill. The only thing Halo has going for it is a marginally longer time to kill and the ability to attempt to evade fire. But, again, hitscan.


You do know that one a few of the weapons are hitscan, right? BR is, DMR isn't.


You do know that there's no reason to choose the BR over the DMR in ranges where hitscan matters, and that the DMR performs well enough in ranges where the BR performs well, right?


Irrelevant, you implied that all the weapons were hitscan. I said they're not and used BR/DMR as an example =)


What you think you read and what I actually typed are two different things, and I've got better things to do than talk any more to a known board troll. Later.
---
Invading world of the guilty as spirit of vengeance The guilty pay the price.
I hate Square-Activision's FFXIII and its slew of cash-in spin-offs & sequels
  1. Boards
  2. Halo 4
  3. Halo sucks because of CoD (for most people)

Report Message

Terms of Use Violations:

Etiquette Issues:

Notes (optional; required for "Other"):
Add user to Ignore List after reporting

Topic Sticky

You are not allowed to request a sticky.

  • Topic Archived